Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Woman in power is powerless when it comes to meeting men
http://www.mcall.com/ ^ | September 17, 2005 | Amy Alkon

Posted on 09/17/2005 6:59:48 AM PDT by teldon30

Dear Amy: I'd like to be in a relationship again, but I never even get asked out (unless you count frisky 85-year-olds and drunks at the corner bar). I'm a 32-year-old woman who's happy, sociable, and attractive. (I paid for college by modeling and continue to take care of myself.) I'm second-in-command at a big company, financially secure, and own a beautiful home. How can I meet men in general, and more specifically, men I'd actually want to date?

Deluxe Chopped Liver

Dear Deluxe: To scare away vampires, it takes garlic and crosses, which make ugly bulges in sleek, satin evening bags. Luckily, all you have to do to scare away men is pull out a business card that says ''senior vice president.''

''Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac,'' said Henry Kissinger. Sure it is — unless you're a woman. Research by Stephanie L. Brown and Brian P. Lewis, published in Evolution and Human Behavior (Nov. '04), seems to confirm what many lonely women at the top already know: When guys go for the woman in the boardroom, it isn't the woman running the meeting but the secretary who wheeled in the coffee and croissants before it started.

Sure, plenty of men will scamper up the corporate ladder for a one-night stand. But, according to Brown and Lewis' study, men looking for dates or relationships tend to prefer their subordinates to their colleagues or bosses. The researchers hypothesize that men evolved to want women they can control as a means of guarding against ''parental uncertainty'' — unwittingly raising kids fathered by the Neanderthal next door as their own. Brown and Lewis think this may also explain why men are suckers for ''behavioral expressions of vulnerability'' — women who act like they might not be able to make it across the street

(Excerpt) Read more at mcall.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: dating; singles
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,141-1,1601,161-1,1801,181-1,2001,201-1,220 last
To: fqued; All
The one person who truly "gets it" posted #1166

Live & Learn or just Survive & Deny

1,201 posted on 09/19/2005 6:52:39 PM PDT by apackof2 (Never underestimate the power of a fuzzy friend!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1199 | View Replies]

To: marajade
I'm a geeky girl... like computers, home theater stuff, electronics, and sci fi.

pretty cool, in my opinion. flaunt it.
1,202 posted on 09/19/2005 7:59:47 PM PDT by fqued (radiation comb-over)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1198 | View Replies]

To: fqued
IMHO, it is a LOT better that you like HT, electronics, computers, sci-fi and technical things... those things all matter a LOT more than fashion, Hollywood, pop-culture, and the like.

Better to know what Dolby 7.1, ROM and DDR stand for, than what Ben Afleck is doing nowdays, (or whoever)
1,203 posted on 09/19/2005 10:25:01 PM PDT by Rca2000 ( "What? No gravy? (POW!!) "Next time, remember the gravy!!!"(From "Chow Hound",1951.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1202 | View Replies]

To: Rca2000

Sorry.. posted to the wrong poster.


1,204 posted on 09/19/2005 10:27:06 PM PDT by Rca2000 ( "What? No gravy? (POW!!) "Next time, remember the gravy!!!"(From "Chow Hound",1951.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1203 | View Replies]

To: Rca2000; marajade

Rca2000, I think you meant your comment for marajade. I was also complimenting her interests.


1,205 posted on 09/19/2005 10:29:41 PM PDT by fqued (radiation comb-over)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1203 | View Replies]

To: fqued

Yes, I did. Just goes to show that I am human, and capable of my share of mistakes


1,206 posted on 09/19/2005 10:39:02 PM PDT by Rca2000 ( "What? No gravy? (POW!!) "Next time, remember the gravy!!!"(From "Chow Hound",1951.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1205 | View Replies]

To: teldon30

I like women who can handle a fully automatic weapon and watch my back while I snipe liberals from rooftops. Think that whining yuppie "boardroom bitch" is hard enough for that?

I doubt it. (besides, I'm already married to one who is... and I can't divorce her anyway because she's grabbed my prized Colt original CAR-15, so eat your heart out, baby...)


1,207 posted on 09/19/2005 10:50:00 PM PDT by fire_eye (Socialism is the opiate of academia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marajade

Oh, and BTW-- I figured the "SW"stood for Smith and Wesson.


1,208 posted on 09/20/2005 12:51:21 AM PDT by Rca2000 ( "What? No gravy? (POW!!) "Next time, remember the gravy!!!"(From "Chow Hound",1951.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1198 | View Replies]

To: fqued
However, in my mundane prose, I must state that you have overstated the issue in your post.

Mundane or not, "overstated" is a pretty ironic charge coming from the guy using a functional adolescent (the "dude who can't keep a job for more than two months.") as his foil in the "marriage material" contest. You might as well compare an adult to a high school freshman.

Sorry, but I regard trotting out such a cypher to support your point as disingenuous as crafting public policy based on the putative "old person" that has to eat dog food in order to afford "Depends."

Even so, the issue wasn't overstated by me: it was rebutted by me.

I think that a woman, in choosing a mate, should (maybe "ought to") consider whether this man will be able to provide a stable and safe environment for the raising of children, i.e., for her and for her children. This demands a consideration of his "pocketbook potential."

I might be inclined to agree with you if what we saw 'in the wild' was a pass/fail standard, but that is most definitely NOT what we see.

What the men on this thread are reporting is being graded pass/fail on "comeliness," with money acting as an exponent to the calculation.

Were I to look for an analogous rhetorical shell-game to defending financial "consideration," my first choice would BE "Choice."

Despite loud protestations about sovereignty over their own bodies, such women prove to be remarkably unconcerned by any infringement aside from those which touch on abortion.

The rhetorical maneuvering I've seen so far is another expression of the same type of duplicity. Rational self-interest is being used to camouflage naked avarice.

Does that mean that a millionaire should win out over a tow truck driver? NO!

The question you should be asking here is not "should they," but "do they." And answering THAT question with anything but a negative leaves your credibility in the dust.

admittedly, there are some woman who marry for money, but that is not the issue here.

That is exactly the issue here. Plausible deniability is not going to get you benefit of the doubt when practical experience allows no doubt.

Men aren't offended by prospective mates qualifying them, they're offended by the weight and single-minded attention given to their finances in that qualification.

The issue is whether the man's income or income-potential is a legitimate consideration in choosing a mate, and I agree with those who say "yes."

And I agree most Freeperettes wouldn't fall under the assertions I've put forward, but most women aren't Freeperettes.

What I can't understand is how the most strident defenders of 'financial consideration' on this thread have expressly rejected it in their own lives. It resembles nothing else, so much as American college students defending "The Revolution."

1,209 posted on 09/20/2005 2:13:22 PM PDT by papertyger ("ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge" ... Charles Darwin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1191 | View Replies]

To: papertyger
What I can't understand is how the most strident defenders of 'financial consideration' on this thread have expressly rejected it in their own lives

true irony, and I am one of those. In the end, it seems to be an intellectual assessment by some in Freeperdom, rather than a life experience.
1,210 posted on 09/20/2005 6:40:56 PM PDT by fqued (You don't have to fight every fight, you don't have to win every battle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1209 | View Replies]

To: PigRigger
1. If she wears to much make-up...stay away.
2. If her finger nails and toe nails are constantly polished and manicured....stay away.
3. If she is perpetually tanned....stay away
4. If she can't be seen wearing anything other than the latest fashions....stay away.

You forgot my fave - if she wears very, very (2 verys+) pointy shoes, stay away.

1,211 posted on 09/20/2005 10:08:46 PM PDT by HitmanLV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1163 | View Replies]

To: Nowhere Man

You dig cars? I want a red 1965 Sunbeam Tiger convertible, the car Maxwell Smart drives in the tv series 'Get Smart.' :-)


1,212 posted on 09/20/2005 10:12:32 PM PDT by HitmanLV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1196 | View Replies]

To: HitmanNY

pointy toed shoes....you are so correct.....


1,213 posted on 09/21/2005 4:22:05 AM PDT by PigRigger (Send donations to http://www.AdoptAPlatoon.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1211 | View Replies]

To: teldon30

So this what I will be looking forward to ...it's already hard for me now...I'm a female college student.....well it explans why women like Oprah or Dr. Sec. Rice never married.
By the I 'm not looking foward to marrage anyway...because I tend to stand out anyway with saying a word.

lbjgal


1,214 posted on 09/21/2005 11:17:16 AM PDT by lbjgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kstewskis
if he doesn't ask her out, he's not intererested

Or he may have learned the hard way not to bother. After making the first move thousands of times, with no useful results (ie, I was still single), somewhere in my mid-30's I finally concluded, "If she's not interested enough to make the first move, she's not interested at all!"

So I gave up chasing. And my wife made the first move.

1,215 posted on 09/23/2005 12:18:40 AM PDT by Rytwyng
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: lbjgal
So this what I will be looking forward to ...it's already hard for me now...I'm a female college student.....well it explans why women like Oprah or Dr. Sec. Rice never married

I can tell you exactly why Oprah never married, and it has nothing to do with money, power, or status. As for Condoleeza, well, tragically in the African-American community there's a shortage of good men, relative to the number of good women available. At least, that is my observation as an outsider.

Generally speaking, however, women instinctively look UP the status ladder for mates, whereas men do not care at all. Hence a higher a man's status, the more mating opportunities he has; whereas, as a woman's status goes higher and higher, she unconsciously screens out a greater and greater percentage of the male population. In other words, it has nothing to do with men's prejudices and everything to do with female instincts.

1,216 posted on 09/23/2005 12:29:48 AM PDT by Rytwyng
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1214 | View Replies]

To: Age of Reason
Apologies for not responding to you sooner. I had been called out of town rather suddenly and only now have returned.

I do note, however, that it seems none of them were somehow worthy of your continued attention, else you would not be speaking of them in the past tense.

I have dated occasionally as the inclination struck, and whether or not it was I or they that did the asking, for one reason or another things simply did not work out. Now I am currently involved with someone and no longer looking.

I have never been the sort to consider women 'brief amusements', under any circumstances, and despete the assumptions of some to believe that simply because it was a member of the fairer sex that did the asking somehow that 'classified' them as somehow being, ehmmrr, 'less desireable', in reality I am not usually out and about looking for 'dates' so at the time they asked I changed My inclinations and decided to accept the offer in leiu of a rather quiet interlude pursuing more solitary pastimes.

Things simply did not work out in the past. Asking party notwithstanding.

1,217 posted on 09/23/2005 11:59:10 PM PDT by Utilizer (What does not kill you... - can sometimes damage you QUITE severely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1161 | View Replies]

To: Rca2000
Have you noticed this trend, also?

I have noticed that indeed newer cars are being listed as 'more powerful' in recent advertisements. However, I also remember laughing hysterically at a commercial advertisement for "The new, improved model with the INCREDIBLY powerful one hundred and twenty-five horsepower engine!!!"

I think you overlooked the part as well when I specified that what was under the hood in My auto was not by any stretch of the imagination a standard powerplant. Disregarding for the moment the electical changes I implemented in the vehicle as well due to the fact that they had little to do with the motor. I loved that car because no matter what happened I could always repair it, no matter what. I specifically modified the powerplant as a proof-of-concept platform, but those older cars I have a passion for because of their simplicity. They 'Just Work'. My preferred auto would be a customized Model T, incidentally.

1,218 posted on 09/24/2005 12:35:18 AM PDT by Utilizer (What does not kill you... - can sometimes damage you QUITE severely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1189 | View Replies]

To: Utilizer
My preferred auto would be a customized Model T, incidentally.

You and me both!

1,219 posted on 10/08/2005 10:43:06 AM PDT by technochick99 (Firearm of choice: Sig Sauer....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1218 | View Replies]

To: technochick99

LOL! Glad to see you have good taste, luv. *grin*


1,220 posted on 10/08/2005 1:16:08 PM PDT by Utilizer (What does not kill you... - can sometimes damage you QUITE severely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1219 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,141-1,1601,161-1,1801,181-1,2001,201-1,220 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson