Skip to comments.
Vang says three hunters deserved to die (Day 5 PM Update)
Star Tribune ^
| 9/15/05
| Larry Oakes
Posted on 09/15/2005 6:33:33 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-205 next last
To: PjhCPA; Iowa Granny; Petruchio; SJackson; Rytwyng; Dr Snide; ozaukeemom; JLO; brbethke; gieriscm; ..
2
posted on
09/15/2005 6:34:56 PM PDT
by
ButThreeLeftsDo
(Carry Daily, Apply Sparingly.)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Vang has sealed his fate by admitting that he acted as judge, juror, and executioner.
3
posted on
09/15/2005 6:35:36 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
To: All
4
posted on
09/15/2005 6:37:33 PM PDT
by
ButThreeLeftsDo
(Carry Daily, Apply Sparingly.)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
I just posted on the other thread that this testimony should have gotten him the needle. Instead it should mean, he will spend the rest of his life behind bars(hopefully a short life). I guess I should be careful what I say or imply. And, no it isn't because the defendant is Hmong; it is because he is a cold blooded murderer using his race as a shield.
5
posted on
09/15/2005 6:38:00 PM PDT
by
ozaukeemom
(Nuke the ACLU and their snivel rights!)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Last time I checked, it is not a good idea to cuss a man carrying a gun.
There was no excuse for Vang to shoot them, but sometimes it is a lot wiser to keep quiet.
Again, I am not defending or justifying Vang. He should be executed.
6
posted on
09/15/2005 6:38:55 PM PDT
by
arjay
(May God give President Bush strength and comfort in this time of struggle!)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Too bad Wisconsin doesn't have the death penalty.
To: cripplecreek
I'm still trying to digest the live testimony I listened to this afternoon. I'll try to boil it down for a future forum.
If anybody else caught Vang's testimony today, let's have your analysis.
8
posted on
09/15/2005 6:41:24 PM PDT
by
ButThreeLeftsDo
(Carry Daily, Apply Sparingly.)
To: arjay
Last time I checked, it is not a good idea to cuss a man carrying a gun. How do you know they cursed at him?
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
This Vang guys attorney(s) must really stink. ( which I am not complaining about really, the guy is guilty no doubt).
But if this man is spouting stuff like this on the stand, his attorney(s) should have forseen this and kept him under wraps.
I wonder if this was done on purpose, looking down the road for an appeal.
I thought this guy had some high profile attorneys representing him?
10
posted on
09/15/2005 6:42:57 PM PDT
by
Peace will be here soon
(Liberal definition of looting: " Self-help Humanitarian Aid.")
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
I guess the attorney had no choice but to put him on the stand. It does sound like the people who confronted him escalted the situation. If he gets off it's going to be open season on white people, I hope the jury realizes that.
11
posted on
09/15/2005 6:43:49 PM PDT
by
jocon307
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Good move, putting him on the stand.
12
posted on
09/15/2005 6:44:56 PM PDT
by
Fido969
("And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free" (John 8:32).)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
I haven't been following it beyond here at FR but that "It's who he was" comment makes me wonder if he's killed others. Almost sounds like Dennis Rader.
13
posted on
09/15/2005 6:45:08 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
That is what he said in the article. He may be lying, of course, but I still say it is not a good idea to curse a man with a gun.
14
posted on
09/15/2005 6:46:14 PM PDT
by
arjay
(May God give President Bush strength and comfort in this time of struggle!)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
This is scary and sad stuff. Even if he was afraid and the men acted as they did, he didn't have to shoot anyone.
The grandmother's statement is appropriate. I think she feels shamed by her son's actions and sorry for the families.
15
posted on
09/15/2005 6:46:40 PM PDT
by
Ruth A.
To: All
I need to shut down for the night.
I'm fried.
Have at it and I'll catch up in the morning.
If there will be any live coverage by MN media tomorrow, I'll ping ya'.
16
posted on
09/15/2005 6:46:48 PM PDT
by
ButThreeLeftsDo
(Carry Daily, Apply Sparingly.)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
OOOH, that's not gonna help.
I hope this guy lives a very long time in a very bad prison.
17
posted on
09/15/2005 6:47:55 PM PDT
by
SolidRedState
(E Pluribus Funk --- (Latin taglines are sooooo cool! Don't ya think?))
To: jocon307
It does sound like the people who confronted him escalted the situation. According to the guy who shot unarmed people in the back.
I am sightly skeptical of his version of events.
18
posted on
09/15/2005 6:48:17 PM PDT
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Machina improba! Vel mihi ede potum vel mihi redde nummos meos!)
He said that he removed the telescopic sight from his rifle and spun around, shooting Willers.Bravo Sierra.
Scopes aren't simply removed. It takes tools and time.
I don't believe any "scope" testimony in this trial.
19
posted on
09/15/2005 6:49:26 PM PDT
by
Eaker
(My Wife Rocks! - I will never take Dix off of my ping list as I have been asked to do.)
To: arjay
That is what he said in the article. He may be lying, of courseOf course.
20
posted on
09/15/2005 6:49:42 PM PDT
by
JCEccles
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-205 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson