Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Born Conservative
A very relevant post.

I have to admit that I went to an all girls' private school, the headmistress of which is quoted in one of this article.

Girls and boys learn differently. By being separated from boys, girls can concentrate on learning, on leading (in clubs etc.) and don't have worry about what Tommy will think if she answers the question. They are allowed to grow independently (and they get into less trouble sexually). I'm all for it.

http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=10155538&BRD=2329&PAG=461&dept_id=484827&rfi=6

Some may argue that there is too much of a difference between public and private schools. I'm still trying to figure out why public schools can't challenge their students as the private schools do. It's not all money; look at how expensive our school taxes are.

87 posted on 09/16/2005 6:39:43 AM PDT by Republicanprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: Republicanprofessor
"Girls and boys learn differently. By being separated from boys, girls can concentrate on learning, on leading (in clubs etc.) and don't have worry about what Tommy will think if she answers the question. They are allowed to grow independently (and they get into less trouble sexually). I'm all for it.

Swap "girls" for "boys" in the above paragraph, and it's also true.

Actually, it would be MORE of an improvement for boys, as the "ed-biz" these days is turning into more and more of a "woman-dominated" environment, and women think "natural boy behavior" is "bad" or a result of ADHD, and drug the poor little males into a stupor.

88 posted on 09/16/2005 6:52:39 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson