Blatant Kyoto lie from the MSM (It's all Bush's fault!)

Reuters ^ | Sept. 14, 2005 | Timothy Gardner

[American in Singapore]

...U.S. companies, unlike their counterparts based in most other industrialized countries, are not required to cut emissions because President George W. Bush backed out of the Kyoto Protocol early in his first term. The pact went into force this year...

[American in Singapore]

Before, the MSM at least insinuated that it was Bush's fault by saying that he didn't support Kyoto but I guess now it's "to heck with that, let's just come straight out and lie about it".

Either Mr. Gardner never used Google (it took me 15 seconds to find that the Senate voted 95-0 to reject Kyoto in 1997 - while the First Black President was in the White House) or he is an absolute blatant liar. Hmmm... I wonder which it is :-)

Reuters has turned into such a commie leftist news organization; China News Daily is more balanced than that rag.

[JohnLongIsland]

the implication is that chicom coal mines and labor camp factories are the state of the art factories that this country should aspire to, and throw in russian nuclear power plants for good measure

[MNJohnnie]

Funny how the Bush Hater Press never remember that Clinton did not even bother to send Kyoto to the US Senate because he knew he had ZERO votes for it. Bush did not "back out" of anything lying scum at Reuters. So which is it, are Reuters Editors criminally incompetent or just woefully stupid?

[MNJohnnie]

Ah thank you. I never knew it had actually gone to the Senate. I heard Clinton did NOT send it. Thanks for the correction.

[Cementjungle]

http://www.nationalcenter.org/KyotoSenate.html

[Mad Dawg]

Google ["Timothy Gardner" Reuters]

This guy is a global warming cultist. He probably forgot what "Truth" is or how to tell it years ago.

[ConservativeGreek]

Feedback is at the bottom of this link. Very disturbing with "reporter" blatant lies and personal views.

http://today.reuters.com/news/default.aspx

[American in Singapore]

Thanks a lot. Basically I pointed them back to this link so they could see how much publicity that their lyin' cheatin' reporter has received.

I have only posted new threads here on FR a couple of times so tell me if this was the wrong thing to do.

[stefan10]

I have read in a newspaper that several states at the east cost and some at the west cost including california want to establish the Kyoto requirements.

Is this possible in the US?

If so given the economic importance and power of these states that would make the US more or less a part of the Kyoto program.

[MNJohnnie]

If so given the economic importance and power of these states that would make the US more or less a part of the Kyoto program.

Umm NO. Since the effected states would simply lose business to neighboring states that did NOT try to impose Kyoto there would be no change in emissions. Funny thing, seems even the EU nations that bought into Kyoto are NOT making their emission targets. Kyoto is a giant fraud.

[Erik Latranyi]

Scientists believe gases such as carbon dioxide...

They can't even pretend that global warming is fact.

They still have to use the word "believe" because the global warming crowd is much more like an organized religion than a group of scientists.

[Erik Latranyi]

the implication is that chicom coal mines and labor camp factories are the state of the art factories ...

When controlled by liberals, big gov't can do no wrong.

[auboy]

That would be (A).