Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MeanWestTexan

Well, from this article, it appears that you only have to be suspected of drunk driving.


14 posted on 09/14/2005 3:53:46 PM PDT by LongElegantLegs ("Nuthin' ain't worth nuthin', but it's free.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: LongElegantLegs
The average driver knows if they have been drinking or not. The police also have a pretty good idea if the driver has been drinking.

In our state driving is a privilege. The cop asks you to take the test, you say no, your license is taken on the spot and you still have to go to court and fight the charge.
21 posted on 09/14/2005 3:59:09 PM PDT by PeteB570
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: LongElegantLegs

What's the big deal? In most states, if you refuse a sobriety test, you are convicted of DUI anyway.

If you take the test, at least you can prove that you may be a lousy driver, but you're not under the influence of anything other than your own carelessness.


27 posted on 09/14/2005 4:00:10 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: LongElegantLegs

I looked this up; I am correct re: only post-accident can it be forced.


49 posted on 09/14/2005 4:14:40 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan (A good friend helps you move. A great friend helps you move a body.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson