Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why did it take Clinton 8 DAYS to visit the flood area in 1997?
CNN ^

Posted on 09/14/2005 2:27:29 PM PDT by JohnRand

"...April 14, 1997 Web posted at: 2:05 p.m. EDT (0605 GMT)

(CNN) -- The flooded Red River was past its high-water mark at Fargo, North Dakota, and nearby Moorhead, Minnesota, Monday, as Fargo moved into a post-flood cleanup mode."

http://www.cnn.com/WEATHER/9704/14/floods.update/index.html

"GRAND FORKS, N.D. (AllPolitics, April 22) -- President Bill Clinton, in his role as consoler-in-chief, toured the flood-ravaged upper Midwest today and declared the federal government will help people there rebuild their homes and lives."

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/04/22/earth.floods/

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; clinton; flood; katrina; katrinafacts; mdm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
There are two stories linked above related to the historic 1997 Red River Valley flood. I'm not sure if I'm linking them correctly on here so please accept my apologies!! But at any rate Fargo, ND was flooded April 14, 1997 and President Clinton visited the area 8 days later on April 22, 1997 and was hailed by CNN as the "consoler-in-chief" and NOT hammered by the media, the Governor of ND, or the Mayors of Fargo or Grand Forks as being uncaring or racist for not visiting the area for 8 days!
1 posted on 09/14/2005 2:27:31 PM PDT by JohnRand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnRand

Well, you see, he was too busy feeling their pain.


2 posted on 09/14/2005 2:29:21 PM PDT by atomicpossum (Replies should be as pedantic as possible. I love that so much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomicpossum

Feeling that among other things, no doubt.


3 posted on 09/14/2005 2:30:50 PM PDT by M203M4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnRand

Good find.


4 posted on 09/14/2005 2:31:09 PM PDT by KJC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnRand
Why did it take Clinton 8 DAYS to visit the flood area in 1997?

OK, I'll bite, why...?

5 posted on 09/14/2005 2:31:44 PM PDT by Snardius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnRand
BILL CLINTON DOESN'T CARE ABOUT POOR WHITE FARMERS!

I want someone to find the Sink-Stainer's schedule for that week....I want to know what was more important than visiting the citizens of this country who were being flooded out!!

6 posted on 09/14/2005 2:32:24 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnRand

Clinton never visited the WTC site in February '93 either.


7 posted on 09/14/2005 2:32:27 PM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnRand

And the area is still not rebuilt. I ber NO gets done before ND does.


8 posted on 09/14/2005 2:32:49 PM PDT by satchmodog9 (Murder and weather are our only news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnRand
Because he could.

-PJ

9 posted on 09/14/2005 2:33:23 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M203M4

"Feeling that among other things, no doubt."

Took him awhile to get his pants back on. Our former prez, The National Disgrace.


10 posted on 09/14/2005 2:33:45 PM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnRand

If CNN sees this, they'll delete the archived HTML file.


11 posted on 09/14/2005 2:34:48 PM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnRand
I heard on Rush's show this week, that Clinton's FEMA was 30 days getting in an area after hurricane Floyd (I think it was) because of so much flooding.

I'm sorry I don't remember the state though. I zoned in on the "30 days" and "Clinton's FEMA" and didn't commit the rest to memory.
12 posted on 09/14/2005 2:35:20 PM PDT by TexasTaysor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnRand

bittt


13 posted on 09/14/2005 2:35:41 PM PDT by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnRand
Bill was busy with the issues of State !!!!
14 posted on 09/14/2005 2:36:02 PM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnRand
Why did it take Clinton 8 DAYS to visit the flood area in 1997?

It was the one time in his life when he really WAS compassionate.

15 posted on 09/14/2005 2:36:21 PM PDT by DeeOhGee (If you don't know where you're going, any road will get you there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnRand
"I'll be right there"
16 posted on 09/14/2005 2:38:38 PM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnRand
Why did it take Clinton 8 DAYS to visit the flood area in 1997?

It took 8 days becasue there's no hurry when you're a dem.

Clinton was a hero for showing up after 8 days. Same flood, same time, and had it been Bush, he would have been the goat.

Two standards. One for them, one for us.

17 posted on 09/14/2005 2:39:46 PM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnRand
Archive those stories now. It's guaranteed the Leftists will be removing them soon!
18 posted on 09/14/2005 2:41:50 PM PDT by Prime Choice (E=mc^3. Don't drink and derive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnRand

Not too many votes available for Ol' Slick out in that area.


19 posted on 09/14/2005 2:48:45 PM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnRand

It was nasty, dangerous and what good would it have done? He probably figured he would wait until it was COMPLETELY safe. I don't blame him. He has a family too and I wouldn't want MY husband down there when they didn't and STILL don't appreciate what he was doing.


20 posted on 09/14/2005 2:50:01 PM PDT by WasDougsLamb (just my opinion. Go easy on me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson