Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CondorFlight
I guess 'stare decisis' ('a thing decided'), has no weight at all when it comes to traditional practices.

How ironic, considering that the judge in question relied precisely on 'stare decisis' to make his ruling, relying on the precedent set by the 2002 court on this very matter.

Personally, I think this is a good thing. The government has no business forcing children to recite such a patently nationalistic oath anyway, and to compound it by coercing acknowlegement of a religious entity just makes it worse.
157 posted on 09/14/2005 11:36:17 AM PDT by saFeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: saFeather

Oh the horrors of nationalism and religion.


167 posted on 09/14/2005 11:38:36 AM PDT by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

To: saFeather
Personally, I think this is a good thing. The government has no business forcing children to recite such a patently nationalistic oath anyway, and to compound it by coercing acknowlegement of a religious entity just makes it worse.
Actually they can't force children to recite the Pledge. That was established by the Supreme Court in 1943. But "voluntary" organized prayer is also banned.

-Eric

169 posted on 09/14/2005 11:39:05 AM PDT by E Rocc (Anyone who thinks Bush-bashing is banned from FR has never read a Middle East thread.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

To: saFeather
Personally, I think this is a good thing. The government has no business forcing children to recite such a patently nationalistic oath anyway,

There is no forcing of anyone, children or adult.

Jehovah's Witness children refused to pledge allegiance to the flag during WWII, and they won their case in the US Supreme Court.

Children are encouraged by the teacher to say the pledge, not forced.

213 posted on 09/14/2005 11:51:13 AM PDT by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

To: saFeather
"The government has no business forcing children to recite such a patently nationalistic oath anyway, and to compound it by coercing acknowlegement of a religious entity just makes it worse"

Children were forced to recite the Pledge in school as our way of assimilating the huge quantities of refugees from Germany and the Soviet Union. The practice of FORCING children to recite a pledge of patriotism to the flag of the United States of America, where they reside and who's schools are educating them, was STOPPED back in the 1970s because Jehovah's witnesses considered it idol worship.

Since then, the recitation of a Pledge of patriotism and the mention of some nameless, generic deity (I have a Jewish background and KNOW the term "God" is generic) has been VOLUNTARY.

269 posted on 09/14/2005 12:11:12 PM PDT by cake_crumb (Leftist Credo: "One Wing to Rule Them All and to the Dark Side Bind Them")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

To: saFeather
Personally, I think this is a good thing. The government has no business forcing children to recite such a patently nationalistic oath anyway, and to compound it by coercing acknowlegement of a religious entity just makes it worse.

It is already settled law that schools cannot force a child to say the Pledge. This ruling demands that we can not say it in school, even voluntarily.

461 posted on 09/14/2005 7:53:14 PM PDT by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson