The Crimes continues their descent into irrelevance.
1 posted on
09/14/2005 5:16:43 AM PDT by
jimbo123
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
To: jimbo123
You mean people would PAY to read that crap online????
2 posted on
09/14/2005 5:17:30 AM PDT by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: jimbo123
"The Internet is losing its innocence." said the King of Popup Ads, Matt Drudge.
3 posted on
09/14/2005 5:18:20 AM PDT by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: jimbo123
Webmaster: "Our web site traffic is stagnant. No growth."
Editor: "Well, let's start charging for content. That should improve our web traffic."
4 posted on
09/14/2005 5:19:25 AM PDT by
coconutt2000
(NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
To: jimbo123
If you paid me $49.95 I still wouldn't read this drivel.
To: jimbo123
who do they think they are charging for their content?
the wall street journal
To: jimbo123
"The Internet is losing its innocence."
I nearly spit my coffee on my monitor. What innocence? The man's either completely ignorant or he's using a soundbite he knows isn't true.
8 posted on
09/14/2005 5:22:28 AM PDT by
Gone GF
To: jimbo123
They were completely worthless free, cannot imagine anyone would bother to PAY to ready their irrelevant babbling.
9 posted on
09/14/2005 5:22:35 AM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(Professional Journalism the Buggy Whip makers of the 21st century)
To: jimbo123
Paying for the Times?? That's like following your neighbor around, picking up after his dog and paying him for the privilege of doing so.
10 posted on
09/14/2005 5:23:13 AM PDT by
reagan_fanatic
(Proud member of the 21st century Christian Crusaders)
To: jimbo123
Let's see - I don't go there. Sonow I'm suppose topay $49 a year to not go there????
11 posted on
09/14/2005 5:23:37 AM PDT by
TheBattman
(Islam (and liberalism)- the cult of Satan)
To: lainie
To: jimbo123
The NYY accelerates its sinking into irrelevance. RIP NYT.
To: jimbo123
For 49.95 you get access to 72 commies? No thanks.
16 posted on
09/14/2005 5:27:29 AM PDT by
Waco
To: jimbo123
Cheaper by the roll at Costco.
To: jimbo123
I hope it's a large caliber they shoot their foot with.
19 posted on
09/14/2005 5:32:52 AM PDT by
numberonepal
(Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
To: jimbo123
Damn! I already boycott them....Now I can't drop them in protest.
21 posted on
09/14/2005 5:33:03 AM PDT by
wildcatf4f3
(Putin 2008!!)
To: jimbo123
Atypical of Libs, raise taxes and think their economy is going to grow.
To: jimbo123
Why the halfway measure? The Times should up its newsstand price to $5.00 a copy and cutoff its readers entirely.
26 posted on
09/14/2005 5:40:15 AM PDT by
OESY
To: jimbo123
As its editorial policies repeatedly demonstrate, the Times does not understand the economic concept of elasticity. Consumers of news have many choices is a highly competitive marketplace. More competently written and analyzed news is readily available elsewhere. This will help spur the conversion from the Old Media to the New: the Information Revolution. At last, the Times journalists are assisting a worthwhile revolution.
28 posted on
09/14/2005 5:47:18 AM PDT by
OESY
To: jimbo123
Forget paying the Times anything....they get their points across with the MSM spewing their talking points.
To: jimbo123
Got to make up for the loss in revenue from circulation of the print version somehow. It looks like the ol' gray mare is going to put itself out of its own misery.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson