Skip to comments.
DeLay declares 'victory' in war on budget fat (Barf!)
The Washington Times ^
 | 9/14/05
 | Amy Fagan and Stephen Dinan
Posted on 09/13/2005 10:57:19 PM PDT by Hank Rearden
House Majority Leader Tom DeLay said yesterday that Republicans have done so well in cutting spending that he declared an "ongoing victory," and said there is simply no fat left to cut in the federal budget.
 
Mr. DeLay was defending Republicans' choice to borrow money and add to this year's expected $331 billion deficit to pay for Hurricane Katrina relief. Some Republicans have said Congress should make cuts in other areas, but Mr. DeLay said that doesn't seem possible.
(Excerpt) Read more at insider.washingtontimes.com ...
TOPICS: Government; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: governmenttheft; ilovepork; pork; porkage; republicanbozos; texas; tomdelay; waste; wastefraudabuse; whatrtheysmoking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next  last
    Republicans have done so well in cutting spending that he declared an "ongoing victory," and said there is simply no fat left to cut in the federal budget.
 
Does no one at all remember just last month, when DeLay and the rest of the parasites passed their disgusting "energy" and "highway" porkage?
 
How the hell can anybody continue to support these clowns?
 
To: Hank Rearden
    It's official, Delay has been in Washington too long. Time for him to go home and let another citizen take over his job.
 
2
posted on 
09/13/2005 10:59:49 PM PDT
by 
glorgau
 
To: Hank Rearden
    Tom DeLay said yesterday that Republicans have done so well in cutting spending that he declared an "ongoing victory,"
 
If the current federal budget represents an ongoing victory, we lost a long, long, long time ago.
 
3
posted on 
09/13/2005 11:02:50 PM PDT
by 
SittinYonder
(Nemo me impune lacessit)
 
To: Hank Rearden
4
posted on 
09/13/2005 11:04:32 PM PDT
by 
flashbunny
(Why do I have to defend the free market on a web site called free republic???)
 
To: flashbunny
    Had to look twice at the byline I expected to see "Scrapplehead" or whatever
 
5
posted on 
09/13/2005 11:09:54 PM PDT
by 
kublia khan
(absolute war brings total victory)
 
To: flashbunny
    If you want to read the whole article. 
 
http://www.bugmenot.com/view.php?url=washingtontimes.com 
 
The rest of it is not quite as bad as that quote. This is in the context of whether or not to require offsets in exchange for Katrina relief. 
 
And there is one positive thing... Even the Democrats know better than to suggest raising taxes. In fact, Trent Lott is the only person I've heard talking about that and it was off the cuff and not repeated.
 
6
posted on 
09/13/2005 11:15:52 PM PDT
by 
gondramB
(He who dares not offend cannot be honest.)
 
To: flashbunny
    is this satire? Well, it's a joke on all the fools who voted for Republicans thinking they weren't being lied to.
 
7
posted on 
09/13/2005 11:33:03 PM PDT
by 
Hank Rearden
(Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
 
To: Hank Rearden
    Quit bitching and write your Congressman.
 
8
posted on 
09/13/2005 11:48:57 PM PDT
by 
Chunga
(Mock The Left)
 
To: Hank Rearden
    DeLay declares 'victory' in war on budget fat  Sorta reminds me of the fat chick who goes through the salad trough piling on the croutons, bac-o-bits and dressing over a pile of lettuce bigger than her head and convinces herself she is being "good" because she is "only" having a salad for lunch.
 
9
posted on 
09/13/2005 11:53:21 PM PDT
by 
Tall_Texan
(RIP New Orleans 1718-2005)
 
To: SittinYonder
    331 billion isn't really that big of a deficit. Some tax cuts Should take care of it. At one time, Canada, with a population of only 25 million, had a national debt close to that towards the end of the Trudeau years. 
 Considering what we are spending on the millitary, It's not all that bad. Think of what it could be if we had liberals spending like there's no tomorrow like Canada. We'd have a 3.31 TRILLION dollar deficit.
To: Hank Rearden
    House Majority Leader Tom DeLay said yesterday that Republicans have done so well in cutting spending that he declared an "ongoing victory," and said there is simply no fat left to cut in the federal budget.Funny, I have no recollection of any spending cuts, only billions in pork. How can I be so confused? Maybe the idea of "spend and spend more" is their description of cutting spending. Certainly a funny way to show it.
 
11
posted on 
09/14/2005 12:17:18 AM PDT
by 
taxesareforever
(Government is running amuck)
 
To: Hank Rearden
    Delay's sense of timing is incredibly 
 
 
 
bad
 
12
posted on 
09/14/2005 12:39:33 AM PDT
by 
No Longer Free State
(Saddam Hussein harboured and paid terrorists.  Any questions?)
 
To: Nathan Zachary
    331 billion isn't really that big of a deficit. Some tax cuts Should take care of it. Are you freakin' kidding me???? That gigantic deficit (piled onto an even more gigantic debt every damn year) is the result of phony "tax cuts" made without offsetting spending cuts.
 I could sit down with any governmental budget and get rid of 40% of it in 24 hours. Then, within a week, I'd get serious about cutting it.
 
13
posted on 
09/14/2005 12:53:45 AM PDT
by 
Hank Rearden
(Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
 
To: Hank Rearden
    Whatever they do, for the love of Pete, make sure there's enough money to rebuild Trent Lott's house back bigger and better than ever.
 
That was sarcastic.
14
posted on 
09/14/2005 2:11:51 AM PDT
by 
kenth
 
To: Hank Rearden
     I could sit down with any governmental budget and get rid of 40% of it in 24 hours.Correct! It's time to quit talking about cutting "fat" and start talking about removing the giant tumor that is metastasizing.
 
15
posted on 
09/14/2005 3:02:20 AM PDT
by 
jammer
 
To: Nathan Zachary
    I didn't have the deficit in mind. Instead, I was thinking of the money going to feed the enormous size and scope of the federal government.
 
16
posted on 
09/14/2005 4:25:13 AM PDT
by 
SittinYonder
(Nemo me impune lacessit)
 
To: All
    From the article
 CAGW and the Heritage Foundation also suggest rescinding the 6,000-plus earmarked projects in the recently passed highway bill. But Mr. DeLay said those projects are "important infrastructure" and eliminating them could undermine the economy as Congress tries to offer hurricane relief. 
 "It is right to borrow to pay for it," he said. "But it is not right to attack the very economy that will pay for it." 
 Does the Republican party now view federal spending as a tool to be used to shore up the economy? I can't find that anywhere in the party platform.
 
To: Hank Rearden
    If that's the Republican mentality, it won't be long before Republicans are out of power.
 
18
posted on 
09/14/2005 7:39:08 AM PDT
by 
Phocion
("Protection" really means exploiting the consumer. - Milton Friedman)
 
To: Hank Rearden
    As Reagan once said "I did not leave the Democrat Party, the Democrat Party left me!" This is now true of the Republicans. They don't deserve any support and are just as morally corrupt as the Democrats were in 92.
  
 We need to give them a good ass-kicking. Too bad there really is no viable conservative party left.
19
posted on 
09/14/2005 8:43:15 AM PDT
by 
al_again
 
To: Hank Rearden
    His fat a$$ is still in Washington. Please, Texas FReepers, cut him loose!
 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next  last
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson