Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Ginsburg stance is debated - She parried some queries, answered at length on others
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 9/13/5 | Bob Egelko

Posted on 09/13/2005 12:37:38 PM PDT by SmithL

The clash that surfaced at John Roberts' Supreme Court confirmation hearing Monday over whether he should reveal his views on court cases or issues is not merely a conflict between judicial neutrality and the public's right to know.

It's also a partisan battle over a past confirmation hearing and who gets to interpret it.

Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee urged Roberts, a federal appeals court judge nominated by President Bush to succeed the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist, to follow Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's example at her confirmation hearing and keep his opinions to himself. Democrats urged him to follow Ginsburg's lead and speak up.

Ginsburg answered some questions about legal issues and court cases at her 1993 confirmation hearing, but refused to answer others on the grounds that she might be committing herself on future Supreme Court decisions. Both sides in Monday's debate claimed her responses were precedents for their position.

At issue is whether Roberts, in questioning that begins today, should discuss his views on recurring legal issues, like privacy and executive power, and controversial Supreme Court rulings, like Roe vs. Wade and Bush vs. Gore.

The point isn't merely philosophical.

The committee's minority Democrats, mindful of Bush's stated admiration for arch-conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia, suspect that the president has found their stealth equivalent in Roberts. But they lack conclusive evidence.

His most strongly conservative writings, memos as a government lawyer on issues like affirmative action and abortion, date from two decades ago. Some of his rulings in two years on the appeals court suggest a Rehnquist-style conservatism on questions of executive power and states' rights, but he has yet to issue a ruling that would reveal his current stance on any hot-button social issue.

Democrats are also well aware that Bush has other

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; clintonistas; confirmationhearings; doublestandard; ginsburg; judgeroberts; robertshearings; scotus; scoutus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last
To: SmithL
"Bush's stated admiration for arch-conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia"

Arch-conservative, that a new one to me.

21 posted on 09/13/2005 5:02:43 PM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Matron; brivette

<< She reminds me of Ruth Buzzi on "Laugh-In" >>

Looks more like the KGB clone and Jack Nicholson nemisis from "Cuckoos Nest" to me.

And is at least as dangerous as a ship-load of ACLU-ers or the top two hundred attendees at an al-Qeada senior-ranks' convention.


22 posted on 09/13/2005 6:05:23 PM PDT by Brian Allen (Per Ardua ad Astra!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson