Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: Ol' Sparky
WTF? It's the end of the world. What is everyone psychic, I dont think Roberts is a liberal patsy...
2 posted on
09/13/2005 9:22:50 AM PDT by
in hoc signo vinces
("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis.")
To: Ol' Sparky
Farah is a certified wacko....
4 posted on
09/13/2005 9:23:54 AM PDT by
fizziwig
To: Ol' Sparky
He was a plotter, a co-conspirator, a devious manipulator, a spinner. Such name calling! Since turn-about is fairplay, I will say that IMO Mr Farah is a loon.
To: Ol' Sparky
Less "extreme" than Thomas?
I'd like the author to give an example of when and where Thomas has been "extreme".
You want "extreme"? Try the ACLU -- the most extreme organization in American law.
6 posted on
09/13/2005 9:24:24 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
To: Ol' Sparky
8 posted on
09/13/2005 9:25:08 AM PDT by
Incorrigible
(If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
To: Ol' Sparky
So Farah has gone even deeper into sheer idiocy. What a Loon.
To: Dubya's fan
There was once a time when I took Joe Farah seriesly.
Owl_Eagle(If what I just wrote makes you sad or angry,
it was probably sarcasm)
13 posted on
09/13/2005 9:27:13 AM PDT by
End Times Sentinel
(In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
To: Ol' Sparky
Another grunt and splash from WorldNutDaily.
15 posted on
09/13/2005 9:27:44 AM PDT by
RebelBanker
(To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of the women!)
To: Ol' Sparky
Farah needs to go to a mental institution.
17 posted on
09/13/2005 9:29:00 AM PDT by
rwfromkansas
(http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
To: Ol' Sparky
"It really should not matter what the personal ideology of our appointees may be, so long as they recognize that their ideology should have no role in the decisional process – i.e., so long as they believe in judicial restraint."Well since that is all I want out of the judicial branch, I'm utterly failing to see why this philosophy disqualifies Roberts. We don't need the Supreme Court to run around overturning 99% of the U.S. Code; we just need them to get the hell out of the way.
18 posted on
09/13/2005 9:29:00 AM PDT by
Fabozz
To: Ol' Sparky
21 posted on
09/13/2005 9:31:53 AM PDT by
clee1
(We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
To: Ol' Sparky
Roberts is a friend of Ken "Red" Starr?
We're screwed.
To: Ol' Sparky
Even I, the ultimate skeptic***************
He's the ultimate something, but the word I'm thinking of is a bit different.
23 posted on
09/13/2005 9:32:20 AM PDT by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: Ol' Sparky
When Edward Lazarus compares Roberts to Breyer, it sounds to me like he is talking about personality and style, not philosophy and substance.
It sounds like Farah does not perceive the distinction and that Farah ignores other statements.
27 posted on
09/13/2005 9:35:08 AM PDT by
TSchmereL
(words)
To: Ol' Sparky
Up until now, I've been comparing Roberts to Sandra Day O'Connor, Anthony Kennedy and David Souter. I've got news for you. He's worse. That's right, folks. He's worse than we ever expected. Mr. Roberts was born a 1970 AMC Ambassador Station Wagon, and was eventually transmogrofied by Karl Rove and the Bilderbergers into the consummate USSC mole.
Once again, Mr. Farah, please STFU.
28 posted on
09/13/2005 9:36:32 AM PDT by
r9etb
To: Ol' Sparky
I call BS, and maybe I am letting the cat out of the bag, but Coulter and now Farrah are running interference for Roberts... thats how I see it.
31 posted on
09/13/2005 9:39:40 AM PDT by
Paradox
(Just because we are not perfect, does not mean we are not good.)
To: ColdWarNavyVet_dirsup; TommyDale; pro610
ping? thoughts, coldwarnavyvet?
35 posted on
09/13/2005 9:44:01 AM PDT by
Terriergal
(What is the meaning of life?? Man's chief end is to glorify God and to enjoy him for ever.)
To: Cyrano; blackie; jumpdrive
36 posted on
09/13/2005 9:44:29 AM PDT by
Terriergal
(What is the meaning of life?? Man's chief end is to glorify God and to enjoy him for ever.)
To: Ol' Sparky
All I can say is wait and see.
Time will tell whether this analysis is true or not. I don't want to support or outright reject what Farah says.
If he's wrong great
If he's right, the only people who are going to look like fools are those calling him foolish now.
39 posted on
09/13/2005 9:50:40 AM PDT by
Leatherneck_MT
(3-7-77 (No that's not a Date))
To: Ol' Sparky
Farah is nuts (as is anyone) because we are bushbots, the thinking here goes. Fine reasoning!
44 posted on
09/13/2005 9:58:38 AM PDT by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson