Posted on 09/13/2005 4:38:08 AM PDT by frankjr
Couldn't get past the first paragraph. Germans sure are sending their children here as exchange students by the plane load. Obviously it was a CNN survey.
I'm interested in the use of the term, "elite." It is, I take it, a self-praising word, which actually means, "people like us."Perhaps a better word than "elite" would be "arrogant."
Excellent article. The growing divergence between Europe, especially Old Europe, and ourselves is disturbing but perhaps inevitable.
Freepers have to remember this.
We're not all that far behind....
Elite is far from being a complimentary or "self-praising" appellation, especially in supposedly democratic societies.
The same forces are nibbling away at Americanism right now. Socialized care for illegals, the socialized languages of Political Correctness and bilingualism, Conservative paralysis in the face of Liberal harangues and threats - these are warning signs that that which is bringing about the Decline and Fall of Europe is knocking on our door.
Greetings like minded Europeans!
Ignorance is bliss, I hear. I only hope the blissful ones will never want to come to our country for a vacation.
A priviledged group will of course be a small group, else it will not be particularly "priviledged.". . .rather than the "best or most skilled members of a given social group."
If one means only a "priviledged" and not a highly skilled one, why not use the word "priviledged?"Please forgive my nitpicking attitude, but I consider that euphemisms are an important technique of the left. For example, in our political discourse "Public" or "social/society" are usually euphemisms for "government." A "public" school is actually a government school, "the public sector" is nothing other than "the government," and so on.
Even the word "socialism" needs to be understood in that sense; it is actually governmentism - but that of course is too plainly a synonym for "tyranny" to be a good brand for what leftists are trying to sell.
I love how bigotry is OK when it is anti Americanism.
I think the whole article can be summed up by saying that if Jimmy Carter were president of the EU nobody would notice any difference.Difference is, we had Ronald Reagan.
Eye opening. Thanks for sharing it.
They're also sinking as much of their cash as they can sneak out of Europe into American real estate - look at homes/condos in Massachusetts, Florida, parts of Arizona, Texas, etc.
The 'elite' Euro-trash that litter Boston make snide, snotty comments about America but take advantage of the American economic/welfare system that they can, whenever they can.
I provided you with the dictionary definition. I guess there could be cases where you had privileged majorities, e.g., whites during the days of segregation.
rather than the "best or most skilled members of a given social group."
If one means only a "priviledged" and not a highly skilled one, why not use the word "priviledged?"
Of course, I assume you mean privileged (vice priviledged). There is no word priviledged. There are plenty of words that have multiple definitions, depending upon context and usage, current or otherwise. The word elite can be used in both a complimentary and pejorative sense. For example, the Green Berets are an elite organization. A ruling elite or elitism could connote a pejorative description.
Please forgive my nitpicking attitude, but I consider that euphemisms are an important technique of the left. For example, in our political discourse "Public" or "social/society" are usually euphemisms for "government." A "public" school is actually a government school, "the public sector" is nothing other than "the government," and so on.
I don't quite understand what your point is. Certainly, social/society are not euphemisms for government.
Even the word "socialism" needs to be understood in that sense; it is actually governmentism - but that of course is too plainly a synonym for "tyranny" to be a good brand for what leftists are trying to sell.
First, there is no such word as "governmentism." Socialism, the ideology and politial system, does not translate necessarily into tyranny. Europe has plenty of social democracies, which have free and fair elections.
No, our natural allies are the ones fighting the islamists (and relativistic atheists.)
Discounting them would be like Reagan discounting Sakharov or Walesa.
Guess I'm missing all the Europeans standing up to Islam.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.