Skip to comments.
Veteran NJ state trooper charged with aiding drug dealers
Newsday ^
| 09.12.05
Posted on 09/12/2005 8:14:07 PM PDT by Coleus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
1
posted on
09/12/2005 8:14:08 PM PDT
by
Coleus
To: Coleus
throw away the key on these fatherless punks
2
posted on
09/12/2005 8:16:48 PM PDT
by
phil112
To: Coleus
Hi Coleus-
Yet people wonder why FReepers are so finicky about police having probable cause when they want to take a peek in your automobile trunk. This is a really unfortunate story.
~ Blue Jays ~
3
posted on
09/12/2005 8:17:18 PM PDT
by
Blue Jays
(Rock Hard, Ride Free)
To: Coleus
I wonder if he ever worked in New Orleans.
4
posted on
09/12/2005 8:31:33 PM PDT
by
Sthitch
To: Sthitch
I wonder if he ever worked in New Orleans. Heck, I'll lay odds that he's one of them Liberalitarians. ;o)
5
posted on
09/12/2005 8:34:56 PM PDT
by
Prime Choice
(E=mc^3. Don't drink and derive.)
To: Prime Choice
Heck, I'll lay odds that he's one of them Liberalitarians. ;o)
It appears your village is missing one of it's idiots. Blackbird.
To: Prime Choice; BlackbirdSST
Heck, I'll lay odds that he's one of them Liberalitarians. More likely...a Republican.
7
posted on
09/13/2005 4:33:39 AM PDT
by
ActionNewsBill
("In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act")
To: Prime Choice
No, just corrupted by the big money that was put into the drug trade by anti-drug laws.
8
posted on
09/13/2005 8:40:17 AM PDT
by
Know your rights
(The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
To: Know your rights
Huh. Every time I see one of your posts, the song "One Toke Over The Line" always comes to mind.
Why don't you just be honest and admit that you just wanna smoke dope and you don't believe the crap you spew?
9
posted on
09/13/2005 8:44:55 AM PDT
by
Prime Choice
(E=mc^3. Don't drink and derive.)
To: BlackbirdSST
And it appears your village is missing its slacker stoner.
Not that they actually miss the critter, mind you...
10
posted on
09/13/2005 8:45:42 AM PDT
by
Prime Choice
(E=mc^3. Don't drink and derive.)
To: Prime Choice
Why don't you just be honest and admit that you just wanna smoke dope and you don't believe the crap you spew?My posts are honest. Hey, after your right-out-of-the-gate personal attack, isn't it time for you to boast of your superior logic?
11
posted on
09/13/2005 8:47:29 AM PDT
by
Know your rights
(The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
To: Know your rights
My posts are honest. *choke* *snerk*
12
posted on
09/13/2005 8:49:25 AM PDT
by
Prime Choice
(E=mc^3. Don't drink and derive.)
To: Coleus
One of the reasons that police officers are not supposed to have "known gang associates." This is frequently ignored, unfortunately, both at the time of hiring and during the officer's career.
13
posted on
09/13/2005 8:50:53 AM PDT
by
livius
To: Prime Choice
Argument by graphic ... another Drug Warrior favorite.
14
posted on
09/13/2005 8:57:26 AM PDT
by
Know your rights
(The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
To: Prime Choice; Know your rights
Heck, I'll lay odds that he's one of them Liberalitarians. Did you know that Ronald Reagan called libertarianism the "heart and soul of conservatism"?
Also, being that this story takes place here in dirty Jerz, in the 1997 gubernatorial election the threee choices were pro abortion Republican Christie Whitman, pro-abortion Democrat Jim McGreevy, and pro-life Libertarian Murray Sabrin. I proudly voted for Sabrin. In your opinion, did I do the right thing?
15
posted on
09/13/2005 11:04:32 AM PDT
by
jmc813
("Small-government conservative" is a redundancy, and "compassionate conservative" is an oxymoron.)
To: jmc813
Did you know that Ronald Reagan called libertarianism the "heart and soul of conservatism"? If that's true (and I'm not contesting it, mind you), then why did Reagan initiate the massive War on Drugs that seems to do nothing but infuriate the Liberalitarians?
16
posted on
09/13/2005 12:17:53 PM PDT
by
Prime Choice
(E=mc^3. Don't drink and derive.)
To: Prime Choice
If that's true (and I'm not contesting it, mind you), then why did Reagan initiate the massive War on Drugs that seems to do nothing but infuriate the Liberalitarians? Nixon initiated the Federal WoD, although all of his successors R and D including Reagan kept it up.
As far as the election scenario I presented to you, do you think I did the reight thing for voting for the Libertarian as he was the only pro-lifer running?
17
posted on
09/13/2005 12:22:26 PM PDT
by
jmc813
("Small-government conservative" is a redundancy, and "compassionate conservative" is an oxymoron.)
To: Prime Choice
why did Reagan initiate the massive War on Drugs Everybody makes mistakes; he signed TEFRA, too, if I recall correctly.
18
posted on
09/13/2005 12:24:13 PM PDT
by
Know your rights
(The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
To: jmc813
Depends on how malleable the Republican is, I suppose.
Nice strawman argument, though.
19
posted on
09/13/2005 12:25:03 PM PDT
by
Prime Choice
(E=mc^3. Don't drink and derive.)
To: jmc813
Didn't the individual states have anti-drug laws before Nixon. Or was all that just created in the BB house?
20
posted on
09/13/2005 12:26:28 PM PDT
by
AxelPaulsenJr
(Pray Daily For Our Troops and President Bush and the Gulf Coast.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson