Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Pacific Commander Seeks More Military Contacts With China
Voice Of America ^ | 9/11/05 | Kate Pound Dawson

Posted on 09/12/2005 9:55:29 AM PDT by kiriath_jearim

US Pacific Commander Seeks More Military Contacts With China

By Kate Pound Dawson

Hong Kong 11 September 2005

The head of the U.S. forces in the Pacific says he wants to see more military-to-military contact between the United States and China. Admiral William Fallon says that is one way to strengthen the relationship between the two countries.

After a week of meeting with military officials in China, U.S. Navy Admiral William Fallon says that he wants more of his troops to have a chance to meet their Chinese counterparts.

Admiral Fallon spoke Sunday in Hong Kong where he wrapped up his first visit to China as head of the U.S. Pacific Command.

The admiral told reporters here that the United States and China now have extensive political and economic ties, but their militaries know little about the other.

"And I think it is time that we changed that,” said Admiral Fallon. “I got ready agreement from PLA leaders in Beijing, and as I went around to other places in the country and met with the senior military leaders, in every instance, they also agreed."

The admiral says contact is the best way to avoid making incorrect, and possibly dangerous, assumptions about each other's armed forces.

But the Pacific commander also repeated a concern he voiced in Beijing about the rate of China's military spending. Admiral Fallon says he understands the need to modernize forces, but that without a specific military threat to China, it seems excessive to increase spending by more than the rate of economic growth.

Chinese officials say military spending rose 12 percent this year, although many outside experts think it is higher. The nation's gross domestic product has been growing at about 9.5 percent this year.

Admiral Fallon underscored that the United States is not trying to contain China as Washington realigns its global forces, particularly in Asia.

The U.S. military, which plans to close or consolidate many domestic bases, is talking with its allies about the status of its overseas forces, particularly in Japan and South Korea. Admiral Fallon says those talks aim to make sure that deployments meet modern needs, including the fight against terrorism, and are not simply holdovers from the Cold War.

But he said no decisions had been made regarding possible changes to U.S. forces in Japan or on a proposal to move an aircraft carrier to the U.S. state of Hawaii or the Pacific island territory of Guam.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: wariscoming; withchina

1 posted on 09/12/2005 9:55:30 AM PDT by kiriath_jearim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

What relationship?!


2 posted on 09/12/2005 9:57:07 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys-Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

Quote: The admiral told reporters here that the United States and China now have extensive political and economic ties, but their militaries know little about the other.




Why do I have gut instinct the chinese will learn more about the US than we learn about them????


3 posted on 09/12/2005 9:58:25 AM PDT by superiorslots (Free Traitors are communist China's modern day "Useful Idiots")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

I wonder what leeway someone of his stature has to go around saying stuff like "We need more military cooperation"? It seems like he's a bit off of the reservation on this one, especially in light of their recent war games with Russia...


4 posted on 09/12/2005 10:07:20 AM PDT by steel_resolve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

I can't help but think that Admiral Fallon will have all the Chinese military contact he could ever hope for, say, within the next five years or so.


5 posted on 09/12/2005 10:07:51 AM PDT by Rembrandt_fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

I guess he wants there to be more Chi Com espionage then. When will our military stop promoting globalist peacenicks?


6 posted on 09/12/2005 10:20:37 AM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD

Didn't we have a P3/E3 contact about four years ago, with a little "technology transfer", followed by a prisoner release of course?


7 posted on 09/12/2005 10:39:39 AM PDT by Freedom_Fighter_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt_fan

Agreed, and now I suddenly wonder, since they have bought 80% of our beauracracy and pols, have they bought any of our military brass?


8 posted on 09/12/2005 10:46:59 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Yorktown!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

Ha ha, This reminds me of this incident couple of years ago when there where a port call and the taiwanese flag was raised by accident instead of the chinese which of course offended the admiral.


9 posted on 09/12/2005 5:00:44 PM PDT by Petey139
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
80% strikes me as overly high, but I don't doubt that many powerful and influential people are probably in the Chinese pocket. The public officials and private business people suborned by the Chinese probably don't see what they're doing as treason. The bad guy never thinks of himself as the bad guy--it's engraved in stone somewhere. Think of the Americans who sold steel to the Japanese prior to Pearl Harbor. To paraphrase e.e. cummings, some of our guys were killed by pieces of Brooklyn. Greed is always shortsighted and stupid, by definition.

It strikes me, too, that one of the central arguments against Chinese aggression in Taiwan or elsewhere is that we and the Chinese are so economically intertwined, that such a clearly self-destructive, unprofitable course is unthinkable. That was also the argument prior to WWII. And WWI. Whatever economic reforms the Party in China might have enacted out of pragmatic necessity, this is still the same government that killed millions upon millions of their own. This Party schemes and plots and seeks advantage without hindrance of anything approaching conventional morality. One can hope that it will implode from its own contradictions, as the Soviets did, and go out peacefully, but I wouldn't count on it. In my view, either that Party is removed from power--somehow--or we fight. I dread the prospect, and count nothing as certain, but don't see how our two systems can coexist indefinitely.
10 posted on 09/12/2005 5:51:06 PM PDT by Rembrandt_fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim
This is ... I don't even know how to express it correctly, unbelievable. This admiral is like a colonel in another article - they both think they are diplomat-soldiers. The colonel hoped the Falluja insurgency would become a law enforcement problem and this admiral wants visits and relations with the Chinese.

The admiral should concentrate on how to inflict such a slaughter on their navy if they put out to sea that those p*ss ants won't be able to think straight for two weeks.
11 posted on 09/12/2005 10:06:48 PM PDT by RATkiller (I'm not communist, socialist, Democrat nor Republican so don't call me names)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt_fan

The problem we have is that we see aquisition of wealth as the primary goal.

The Chinese leadership sees it as a tool, much like the bullets they load into a gun.

Once the guns are fully loaded, they will use them.

Their goal isn't to make themselves and their people rich, but to acquire the power to destroy their enemies.


12 posted on 09/13/2005 6:17:50 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson