To: CreviceTool
Wikipedia is dubious at best on a lot of information. It is frightening that history and facts are now subject to even more revision and altering on a grand scale.
15 posted on
09/11/2005 12:28:24 PM PDT by
satchmodog9
(Murder and weather are our only news)
To: satchmodog9
Wikipedia is dubious at best on a lot of information. It is frightening that history and facts are now subject to even more revision and altering on a grand scale.
I have about decided, that the best tactic, is to go there and help them make it as blatantly liberal moonbat as possible until it is so obvious that it is useless as an information source. You will have a lot more success doing that than you will inserting anything balanced in there.
22 posted on
09/11/2005 12:32:44 PM PDT by
Arkinsaw
To: satchmodog9; CreviceTool
Wikipedia is dubious at best on a lot of information. It is frightening that history and facts are now subject to even more revision and altering on a grand scale. Ultimately, anything that gets written is subject to an author's subjective viewpoint.
Your criticism of Wikipedia would apply to all that is authored by humans.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson