Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SteveMcKing
Do not try to reverse the burden of proof because you don't have any. Again, justify your position.

You said first:

"Independent" really just means indecisive, or even apathetic.

The burden of proof firmly lies on you to justify that position. You refuse to do so, instead offering up nothing more than insults and repetition. And now you are trying to worm your way out of your responsibility to justify your statement by trying to shift off your responsibility (in an very Naginesque way, I might add).

Prove that independents are indecisive or apathetic.

123 posted on 09/11/2005 12:55:20 PM PDT by pillbox_girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]


To: pillbox_girl
The burden of proof firmly lies on you to justify that position.

I did. You seem to expect a fully-funded 30-year cohort to be allowed to say anything here, a forum of discussion and opinion.

And now you are trying to worm your way out of your responsibility to justify your statement by trying to shift off your responsibility (in an very Naginesque way, I might add).

I am still here. I have to go in a couple of hours, but I have not "wormed" anything.

Prove that independents are indecisive or apathetic.

I stated my reasoning: "People have all the tools they need to politically define themselves,"

Mathematical proof is neither possible nor required; you either agree respectfully, or (in your case) moan and whine over it.

130 posted on 09/11/2005 1:13:28 PM PDT by SteveMcKing ("I was born a Democrat. I expect I'll be a Democrat the day I leave this earth." -Zell Miller '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson