There were an awful lot of freepers who wanted to elect Bustamonte (sp?) instead of Arnold. OK, they did not put it in those terms, but supporting the number three vote getter is the same thing.
Yea, I know. Knowingly voting for a loser keeps your integrity intact. Unfortunately, it also speeds the takeover by the left and the downfall of anything we cherish. Does anyone think that they Gay Marriage bill would have been vetoed by Bustmonte?
What a crock of bull.
Bustamante never had a chance and no one at FR was working to get him elected.
Arnold was running to replace Governor Doofus. The ONLY reason Bustamente was eligible to be governor is because the CAGOP INSISTED on getting rid of Doofus.
Doofus vetoed the licenses-for-illegals bill before the 2002 election (said he would theoretically support liceneses-for-illegals if he had the "right" kind of built-in safety measures, which is exactly what Arnold said too). I believe Doofus was "officially" against gay marriagse but for civil union (gay marriage lite). That's why the term "gay marriage" was never legaized under Davis' tenure. Ditto with Arnold.
Explain to me again why the Arnoldbots hate Davis so much and how Arnold is an "improvement"? They spent millions to replace Davis with a idelogical twin.