[Carry_Okie]

EO-12986 exempts the International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (shhhh!) (IUCN) from all liability. The IUCN is an umbrella organization to which various other environmental Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) belong. It is effectively the EPA of the UN.

The job of these NGOs is to restrict acccess to resources to those who own the tax-exempt, "charitable" foundations that support them. They system operates on a foundation of treaty laws organized by the IUCN and with staff drawn from the NGOs. They use that treaty law and the courts to maintain shortages and thus guarantee a price support system.

I call that enviro-racketeering, tax fraud, manipulation, etc. The problem with busting them is that the NGOs effectively launder the money.

[SierraWasp]

Well my question then goes back to this litigation that has the same earmarks of the suits against the US Forest Service to make them stop harvesting timber, except that this was against the Army Corps to make them stop making NOLA a safer place!!!

What is it that compells these judges to issue these stop work orders that discourage Federal Agencies from doing their jobs??? It's not Clinton's EO's!!!

Please continue shedding light on the EO's, but there are two fronts on this battlefield and judicial tyranny is the other one!!!