[SierraWasp]

Well my question then goes back to this litigation that has the same earmarks of the suits against the US Forest Service to make them stop harvesting timber, except that this was against the Army Corps to make them stop making NOLA a safer place!!!

What is it that compells these judges to issue these stop work orders that discourage Federal Agencies from doing their jobs??? It's not Clinton's EO's!!!

Please continue shedding light on the EO's, but there are two fronts on this battlefield and judicial tyranny is the other one!!!

[Carry_Okie]

What is it that compells these judges to issue these stop work orders that discourage Federal Agencies from doing their jobs??? It's not Clinton's EO's!!!

The EO merely protects the NGO from lawsuits so that they can bring these actions more fearlessly.

Please continue shedding light on the EO's, but there are two fronts on this battlefield and judicial tyranny is the other one!!!

Obviously, but that isn't what I was asked to explain, but if you go back and re-read the post, I think you'll see it in there.

[Ben Ficklin]

Lets not forget that Title 1 of CARA would have funded Louisiana's coastal mitigation/restoration.

Now retired Congressman Billy Tauzin of LA was the primary instigator of CARA.

Being objective, it is not likely that CARA would have delivered the money soon enough to prevent the damage. It is also possible that Louisiana would have used that Title 1 money to mitigate themselves some freeways and shopping centers.