Posted on 09/08/2005 4:42:37 PM PDT by Dog
The Fox News Channel's Major Garrett made another appearance on the program this evening, following up on his blockbuster story yesterday. Among other things, Garrett got confirmation --on camera-- of the Louisian State department of Homeland Security's blocking of the delivery of relief supplies to the Superdome and the Convention Center. In addition, Garrett received confirmation from senior Salvation Army officials in Washington, D.C. that the Salvation Army's efforts at supplying the evacuees were also repeatedly blocked. Radioblogger will have the transcript up later, but the key takeaway was when I asked Garrett if characterizing Louisian's preparation for the storm as "abysmal" was accurate and he confirmed that indeed it was. Read the whole thing.
I also asked Garrett why no other network is on this story. He can't offer an answer for that, event hough he points out that this isn't a hard story to get, and Fox News needn't be credited. All CNN has to do (or MSNBC or CBS) is call the Red Cross and get a camera over there.
excellent post!
Austin has a pretty good music scene. Still I'd have expected some to make their way to Memphis or Nashville also.
ping
I agree!!!
You know this pair of bumbling buffoons should be REMOVED from office IMMEDIATELY. If they aren't butting heads and contradicting each other, they are doing things like this. UN-FREAKING-BELIEVEABLE!!
You have your lists....and I agree with you all..
NOW, you have that new thread about that Sheriff shutting off the bridge going WEST out of New Orleans, not letting people across.
Forgive me if this has been posted here...I just got here.
The water hadn't even started rising when the media was screaming like little babies. I think they were more afraid that they themselves might miss a meal.
Excellent letter, hope Hastert and others insist upon following this wise advice.
Anyway, nothing can change the fact that Michael Moore is a bloviating sack of pig excrement. Whoops, that just slipped out..... :^)
Same can be said for most of the other 'Rats.....
"...Shepard Smith should be handed a pink slip."
Yup. To match his undies.
Ohh!!..I second and third that!!
The left and its press allies have already established a meme that accuses the administration of devoting too much money for homeland security and not enough for Corps of Engineer flood control work. The Times-Picayune, via Editor and Publisher, complained that money required to complete the Southeast Louisiana Urban Flood Control Project (SELA) slowed to a trickle since more federal dollars were used to support operations in Iraq. Of course, those mean, nasty Bush tax cuts also contributed to the under-funding. The Times-Picayune even got the Army corps of Engineers to pile on when they said,
The Corps never tried to hide the fact that the spending pressures of the war in Iraq, as well as homeland security-- coming at the same time as federal tax cuts -- was the reason for the strain.Also, this past Tuesday on Imus in the Morning, Newsweeks Evan Thomas (who in the past was one of the few and the proud recipients of the CIAs Leak of the Week), also stuck to the playbook when he said that too much money was spent on all of this homeland security stuff instead of fixing the levees. Both Thomas and the Times-Picayune act as if funding for flood control would have alleviated the requirement to respond to a natural disaster that caused the flooding in the first place. Paying for flood control versus disaster response programs is not a zero sum game. This tactic is a slick misdirection to excuse the failure of local and state leadership and to place the blame on an imagined diversion of federal dollars for those silly homeland security and disaster response programs. This is a ludicrous notion, and is demonstrably false.
We now know that New Orleans had a plan, but for some reason, it wasnt implemented. It must have been that damn Iraq War that sucked all the funds from the Louisiana state treasury. In reality, for over six years the state and the city had raked in taxpayer dollars from the federal Office of Domestic Preparedness (ODP) to the tune of 140 million bucks! How do we know this? Because the leaders of disaster agencies in the state of Louisiana told us so and also showed us how this money was spent. As well see, theyve done quite well feeding at the homeland security trough.
The Louisiana state-level strategy to respond to disasters or terrorist attacks was submitted to the ODP on 31 December 2003. This was a requirement established by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and was the only federal agency in recent memory to actually withhold funds to states until workable, threat-based plans were submitted for review. Colonel Jay Mayeaux of the Louisiana Office of Homeland Security & Emergency Preparedness presented the states strategy and funding streams to train and equip state agencies for disaster response based upon the state plan. These agencies include the Fire Service, Law Enforcement, HazMat (Hazardous Materials), EMS, Public Safety Communications, Public Health, and of course Emergency Management.
For Fiscal Year (FY) 2003, ODP grants were allocated in the following amounts: Equipment - $6,633,000, including $1 million for equipment for the Louisiana Urban Search & Rescue Team; disaster and terrorist response exercises - $1,658,000; training -$497,000; planning and administration - $663,000. In addition to the nearly 9.5 million dollars the state initially received, an FY03 supplemental grant totaling nearly $21 million was allocated that included $17 million for direct assistance to local communities. When funds granted for urban security initiatives for New Orleans and critical infrastructure programs are thrown in, the total supplemental FY 03 monies given to the state amounts to $31,319,661!
But it gets better. In FY 04, the ODP granted over $51 million to the state including about $7 million each for Baton Rouge and New Orleans for further work on the urban area security initiative (UASI). According to state officials, the total for ODP grants to the state of Louisiana from1999 to 2003, including supplemental allocations was $100,502,648!
US taxpayers were also very generous in 2005. The DHS database shows that Louisiana had several disaster response agencies receive continued funding, including $17,679,253 for the state Homeland Security Grant Program; $2,895,235 for Emergency Management Performance Grant Program; $910,368 for the Metropolitan Medical Response System Program; and $14,531,675 for the Urban Area Security Initiative. The total amount of federal grants to state of Louisiana for 2005 was $42,669,788. Since 1999, Louisiana has received over $143 million in direct grants for security, communications, and other disaster response initiatives. This amount doesnt include direct grants to the city of New Orleans. For example, in FY03 alone the city received about $6.3 million for first responders and $6.4 million for port security.
And according to the Louisiana State Police, they had specifically planned for a variety of disasters including hurricanes, floods, and hazmat (hazardous materials) incidents. The State Police were even called upon to assist during Hurricane Isabel in September of 2003 to provide storm surge models, wind and rain forecasts, and storm track models. In fact, the LSP seems to have wisely spent money on developing a high tech capability to enhance situational awareness, obtaining mapping and geo-spatial imagery technology, aerial photography, petrochemical pipeline information, development of evacuation plans [emphasis added], and communications interoperability. Where all of this expertise and gadgetry disappeared to when Katrina hit is anybodys guess.
Naturally, the states federal representatives are fond of getting face time while touting the success of funneling homeland security pork to their home districts. Just this past July, Republican Congressman Bobby Jindal met with representatives of the Louisiana State Police and the National Guard [emphasis added] at the Louisiana State Police/Louisiana National Guard Emergency Operations Center and Intelligence Fusion Center in Baton Rouge. The Congressman was impressed with the effort to better protect the nation and the state, and said,
"The security of this nation and of Louisiana are of paramount concern," Jindal continued. "I will continue to work hard on the House Homeland Security Committee to ensure our safety, and I am certain that the Louisiana State Police and Louisiana National Guard are well-equipped to do so as well after viewing their facilities here in Baton Rouge."So it appears that Louisiana and New Orleans had the plans, they had money, troops, police, the command and control, and a solid PR effort. But throwing money at greedy politicians hasnt really solved our disaster and terrorist response problems; and never will. The DHS and politicians of both parties have soaked the American taxpayer for far too long, and we have gotten little or nothing in return. Now we have suffered a human tragedy greater than the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon because we have paid faceless government functionaries to guarantee our safety, thinking they had our best interests at heart. The American people need to demand accountability from these charlatans, or we will witness a repeat on a far greater scale.
What is frightening is that the Katrina disaster is not unlike a situation our first responders and government agencies would encounter in a WMD attack on a major US city. There would be massive destruction, and a contaminated hot zone that rescuers could not enter for days, or perhaps for weeks or months. Survivors would be stranded, infrastructure would collapse, the public health situation would deteriorate, and the bodies would start piling up. Its clear that responsible agencies in New Orleans, Louisiana, and the DHS have flunked their first test since 9-11.
And dont think that Al-Qaeda hasnt been watching and taking copious notes.
Federal funding of Louisiana disaster planning
It has links at that site for verification of the info as well.
"His (Clinton) lowest approval rating came early in his first term, in June 1993, when only 37 percent approved of his performance, while 49 percent disapproved"
http://www.cookpolitical.com/column/1999/061299.php
that is just plain funny!!!
Great line!!! -
What is even more disgraceful is the time it has taken for all the high profile music stars to organize the fund raiser concerts.
My God - it's been over a week and so far, no sign of a guitar, microphone or band wagon. How much effort does it take to organize a concert FGS!!!!!!!!!!!
Retraction - there have been microphones and band wagons - but no music!!!!!!
sp
Really. Isn't Babs going to come out of retirement for the "little people"?
Well if she does, I don't consider that much of a contribution. After all, it's what she does for a living. If some of these "stars" would just shut their mouths and start cleaning up the mud and floating debris.......or haul people out of homes, in small rickety boats - that would be noteworthy.
Short of complaining about everyone else who is carrying the heaviest load, i.e. National Guard troops, EMTs, physicians, Sal.Army volunteers, police & firefighters, they are mental and physical midgets. No offense to any "little people".
sp
It is unfortunate that the guys I really admired have buckled under just when they need to be showing their strengths. It would be great if President Bush would stand on a pile of garbage in NO and announce through a bullhorn that the losers who allowed people to stay in the path of the hurricane will pay for it.
The crappy thing is that even the media are repeating that the feds should have done more, blah, blah, blah.....
They have never done anything to BETTER the country. Just whine, throw a concert, and bash conservatives.
What a life.
They have all jumped on the bandwagon. I wish Bush would slap them all silly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.