worldclass: I never understood this. If the others were the ones threatening to get out of control, why not remove them?
TMan: Excellent point.
Think of it like this: the same-sexers are the "evil eye" of modernity (invidiously envious) and the Left are the 'appeasers" (aiders & abetters) while Parker is the 'object' of the evil eye.
Historically,there've been only two responses to envy. The first one is older than the 2nd one and is this: the envious one is the innocent party while the object of his envy is the guilty party. The rationale goes something like this: If it weren't for you (David Parker & all straight people) same-sexers wouldn't feel the way they do (suffer from envy). Therefore, since Parker is the guilty party it's only fair that he be made to leave (appease the evil eye). The second response arose from God & Christian moral teachings. It says: you have free-will, you know that envy is a sin, therefore you are in the wrong, not David Parker.
America is being turned upside-down by atheist types. By pushing God out of the picture we're returning to the horrible days when everyone was suppressed and in fear of te 'evil eye."
I agree. The more God is pushed out of the classroom, the more decadence is welcomed. These liberals have really gained in acceptance in MA. My son went to school on Hanscom Air Force Base, in Bedford, and was taught some pretty unsavory things while there. We moved and are happier now. The children in the pictures are pawns of the adults and have no real idea of what they are doing. Their signs indicate that the parents don't have much of a clue either at what the issues are.
After 12 years of indoctrinating these children and another 4 to 8 years of training at college, they'll be part of the leftist militia. We can see the results of that in the parents of these kids.