[wallcrawlr]

ping

Revelation 4:11Intelligent Design
See my profile for info

[Buke]

Does this subject belong in a science class though? I am not that familiar with the topic but I heard it is based in Creationism. If that is true, then it belongs in religious type classes.

[Borges]

Both sides call in their tag teams!

[Vaquero]

you have the evidence of the heart the soul....it is irrelevant to science and reality. Just because you try to cram a square peg in a round hole dosent mean you can teach it as science. Keep that in your house of worship and let the scientists teach science. Faith is a wonderful thing that has enriched your life...but please quit cramming it down the throats of children trying to learn the physical nature of the universe. Save that for YOUR OWN kids and the pulpit.

[highball]

To answer the question posed in your graphic:

"Do students have a right to hear all the evidence in science class... even if it contradicts evolution?

We say yes."

I say yes as well. Too bad that there isn't a scrap of actual scientific evidence to support ID.

Once there's a competing theory with even the slightest shred of evidence to back it up, students should be told about it. Yes, even if it contradicts evolution.

To say that evolutionists refuse to allow opposing viewpoints to be taught in science class is disingenuous at best. They simply insist that only science be taught in science class - go figure....