Posted on 09/08/2005 12:47:23 PM PDT by SolidSupplySide
No, evidently you are.
Crikey! The Bush administration is not reeling, mate!
Judith Miller is no longer protecting a source, she is probably protecting herself. She probably made some lucky connections of dots and is in fact the origin of the story herself. She can't give the name of her informant because there probably isn't one.
As I understand her position--The President ordered all his staff to sign waivers and , thus, she doesn't think the waiver she got was freely given.
That's a dodge; Rove has been plain about what he said; and it didn't have anything to do with Bush.
Miller has said that she will not talk, because she "feels" that the permission to state her source, was given under duress. It is impossible to believe that Karl Rove gave his permission "under duress"! Ergo, Judith is 1) lying 2) has another source/s 3) it is NOT Karl Rove.
How does Adam Entous know that?! I thought the investigation was still ongoing. Maybe no one in the Bush administration leaked it. Since most people in DC already knew it because of her loud mouth husband.
Thank you,
Jesse Jackson
Just came across a Slate article about Rehnquist and a problem he had ( before he became Chief Justice ) with a prescribed medication ....maybe they will do some digging on that one....course that wouldn't seem to hurt President Bush any. Maybe they could some how tie it to the Roberts confirmation......they are that desperate it seems to me.
"As I understand her position--The President ordered all his staff to sign waivers and , thus, she doesn't think the waiver she got was freely given."
I don't buy that.
Comedy gold.
When she gets out of jail she's gonna be hailed as the patron saint of Journalists by the NY Times.
"Horseface" wasnt catchy enough
Thank you for the ping.
I am curious who reads the Brisbane's News? Sure seems strange that an American story regarding something leaked about the CIA, a special prosecutor probe and a reporter willing to do jail time would be relevant to Australia.
Does the word "grim." mean something specific to somebody specific?? Then "resolute".
Wonder who the lawyers are close to the investigation are".
Miller's lawyer Abrams says "She is there (in jail) for a reason. At this time the reason still exists..."
Is somebody sending a message or signal to somebody?
Hillary spokesweevil answer: It was a five year climb and the Rodhams were optimistic about the outcome. Yeah that's the ticket.
"She made a promise and, unless properly released from her promise
Properly released. Yes, I've read through the thread in re "Properly Released".
Properly Released
This tells me, that the "proper release" has nothing to do with Karl Rove's "permission". That her "source" has not done the same thing that Karl Rove did.
Or that Miller's Lawyers are doing some negotiating with the "Proper Release" source. What's she asking for in return for the "Proper Release"? ?
"So Judith Miller is in jail protecting the Bush administration?..Yeah, right.."
Yes, this brave woman is refusing to reveal that the evil Karl Rove and the dumb GW were her sources and that both of these evil men were secret employees of Haliburton.
I do. At your service, mate.
[That was said with a southern drawl and not an Aussie accent. Actually, I saw this in a google news search on an unrelated topic.]
This is the key graph. Abrams is the NYT attorney. If Miller wasn't in discussions with SP Fitzgerald, Abrams would have given a blanket denial. Instead, Abrams gave this mealy-mouthed response that actually hints at such discussions.
Take it to the bank that Miller and Fitzgerald are talking.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.