Posted on 09/08/2005 11:08:53 AM PDT by aynrandy
Gouging - even the word sounds frightening.
These days, there's been a near-unanimous call for the public to be outraged over price-gouging at gas pumps around Denver.
Well, I'm not outraged, and you shouldn't be either.
Here in Colorado, as elsewhere in the nation, high gas prices have generated hysterical, populist rhetoric from those who've forgotten the fundamental principles of supply and demand.
"Gas-price gouging is not illegal under Colorado law, and we think it should be," Colorado Speaker of the House Andrew Romanoff recently claimed.
I'm not sure what Romanoff meant by "we" - I would like to be excluded - but anyone who believes gouging is a concern will really have something to complain about if shortsighted price controls are implemented.
This week, Romanoff promised to pressure the state attorney general and the Public Utilities Commission to "investigate" the problem and "combat" gouging.
It's going to be difficult to "combat" the irrefutable fact that fuel supply is down and demand is up. And really there is nothing to investigate, unless you believe in conspiracy theories.
Hurricane Katrina destroyed 12 percent of the nation's refining capacity. This fact, coupled with rising demand from nations such as India and China, has put a tremendous demand on oil - a fungible global commodity.
Price controls bring lower fuel prices and increase demand. But when demand is outstripping supply, we can all look forward to shortages and lines.
Fact is, gouging is a myth. It's called making a profit.
"For many Americans outside of the Gulf Coast, the immediate impact of Hurricane Katrina isn't looting in the streets, it's looting at the pumps," says "Looting at the Pumps," a release by CoPIRG, a public-interest advocacy group.
I spoke to Rex Wilmouth, state director of CoPIRG.
So, was there gouging in Denver?
"We were seeing the prices go up in four or five days from 60 to 70 cents," Wilmouth explains. "Our take on it is this: We looked at how much money the oil industry was making and how much they were posting as profit; we were astounded that they felt the need to increase the price of gasoline in the time of a natural disaster."
Wilmouth, no doubt, is well-intentioned. He will apparently do anything to save us from the evils of Big
Oil - except actually learn about the oil business. "Last week, the stock prices of major U.S. oil producers ExxonMobil, ChevronTexaco and Conoco-Phillips have surged," he tells me as part of a long harangue about the success of Big Oil.
It took me a few minutes to comprehend that this was supposed to be bad news. Millions of Americans own oil stock - shouldn't we be happy for them?
I mean, higher gas prices mean increased stinginess on the part of the consumers at a time of low supply, right?
Isn't that positive?
Don't Americans have alternatives? A consumer can decide to travel less, take public transportation, or buy a fuel-efficient car or drive to a cheaper station.
Hybrids, Wilmouth understands. As you can imagine, he is very excited about hybrids.
Now, Romanoff and Wilmouth are entitled to espouse that government should have the authority to dictate the price of products in the free market.
But then, why stop at oil?
Today, for instance, a quick calculation revealed I had shelled out around 8 bucks a gallon for my bottled spring water.
But that's nothing. Last time I went to see a movie, I paid approximately $200,000 a gallon for soda - I'd need an infinity sign to calculate the per-pound price of popcorn.
Or how about this?
Why don't Colorado and the federal government cut or suspend the 40-50 cents we pay in taxes on each gallon, depending on where you live?
Funny, with all the concern for consumers, no one's proposed something that would actually help them.
David Harsanyi's column appears Monday and Thursday. Reach him at 303-820-1255 or dharsanyi@denverpost.com.
So your tears about high prices are all MOOT when there is nothing to buy, anyway.
------
Alot of worry over nothing, really. No gas? No crude? Hardly. Nothing really in the last 12 months has changed in the market, except...prices. The price of crude, the price of gas, diesel, heating oil, etc.
Where is your shortage? I don't see it. Supply and demand are the same as they were 12 months ago. Again, only prices have changed...and many of the refineries in the Gulf are already back on line --- shortage? Where?
Perhaps you are unaware of the existence of the awakening giant known as "China"?
(We also experience growth in population and energy usage right here in the US as well, but the growth in usage is not nearly as sharp as in Asia.)
SD
I really think these prices are heading down, and they will sttle in the $2.30-$2.50/gal range. I hope that's enough to put your budget back in balance.
we used to sell TONS of chainsaw and kerosine heaters in the early 80 when oil cost so much.
Perhaps you are unaware of the existence of the awakening giant known as "China"?
-----
Not at all unaware -- but also aware that this country does not have a comprehensive energy policy in place and functioning that will ensure the supply of energy we need. Washington has been totally remiss with insuring our supply of domestic oil and energy.
Until that happens IN EARNEST will we ever be in a position to not be completely manipulated by international energy suppliers. We need true competition in our own U.S.-supplied energy market that is not prevented by the campaign contributions to both sides of the aisle in Washington. It is no accident that we are, where we are, with domestic energy supply.
Then why would you say something as nonsensical as you did about nothing changing in the market except price. Demand is a factor in prices.
The rest of what you say, about the gov't needing to work to ensure we have our supply is forthcoming and ample is so rational that only inside the beltway could it be considered controversial.
SD
Demand is a factor in prices.
------
What I said was not nonsensical at all. You are thinking narrowly. I would agree too that DEMAND is a BIG factor in pricing.
In a non-competitive marketplace, it DRIVE PRICES UP!
In a competitive marketplace, it DRIVES THEM DOWN!
Now, which scenario are we suffering?? :-)
When you distill it all down, cost, price, availability versus demand are inseperable -- and at no time have I EVER advocated price controls - I don't believe in them. I just don't like being a victim of a non-competitive, over-priced market. I don't think anyone does -- competition is the key in a healthy, well-balanced capitalist system. Our energy market is not healthy....not for the consumer anyway.
:-)
it is competitive marekt per the figures above. The supply is restricted, but because of government mandates.
In a non-competitive marketplace, it DRIVE PRICES UP!
In a competitive marketplace, it DRIVES THEM DOWN!
If you think demand drives prices down, in any kind of market, you need to go back to Econ 101.
SD
If you think demand drives prices down, in any kind of market, you need to go back to Econ 101.
-----
OK, last iteration.
In the market I work in, as more suppliers AND CAPACITY (as in refineries and cracking plants) comes on board, driven by increased product demand, more competition rises for the amount of available business, and PRICES GO DOWN. You can go back to Econ 101.
Many markets behave that way, and the energy market would IF IT WAS COMPETITIVE and suppliers had to vie for business. But they don't as I have said and as you should be able to reason out.
BYE.
the HHI of this industry is well below 1000 at 704. It is a competitive industry. Intel on the other hand has 80% market share and an index of 6400 on this index well above 1800.
Supply is only restricted by refineries. Even the saudi has told us to build them and would invest in the same.
Puh-leeze, let's not have Washington do anything beyond providing a legal environment for enforcing contracts. I agree that something has to be done-- but let's you and I do any 'something' that needs doing.
|
The price of oil has gone up. If we act fast we (yes, you and I) can explore, drill, and refine oil. If we leave it to the big government types they'll just botch it up like they did in '79. Demand will collapse along with the economy and will take decades to recover (click here to see how oil consumtion is finally recovering).
We don't want any more taxes or regulations to 'fix' (read distort) the market. I'm already expanding US refinery capacity (click here to see how much) and if anyone thinks they can do better they're welcome to join in the fun.
I do not want --repeat DO NOT WANT-- anyone raising my taxes to force me to pay for someone else building their refineries. They can do it on their own nickel for heaven's sake..
with capacity pegged near 100%, it is not enough. It is also impractical to import gas. with no new refineries since 76 there is a real problem. We have gone from 315 to 135 refineries and while the ones remaining have become more efficient, we are still not keeping up.
http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/analysis_publications/oil_market_basics/Ref_image_Crude_runs.htm
This graph from the same site seems to show less capacity coming online.
I received this emai this am, but added my own opinion before passing it on!
Don't know who started this silliness, but would bet they are a) an
environmentalist wacko and/or b) a real Bush Hater. First of all, the
prices are NOT going up!! They are already coming down. Reports are
that by Dec. they will be back to pre-Katrina prices.
I agree that last weekend, some INDIVIDUAL stations upped their
prices before it was necessary. That in my opinion is price gouging,
but it is NOT "this administration's" fault. It is just sorry people
in our own neighborhoods!
Supply and demand pricing is the way our capitalistic society works,
NOT price controls, A few states that have gas taxes (Gov. Sonny
Perdue-REPUBLICAN of Ga.) have waived some of the taxes for a period
of time.( NOT the Gov. of North Carolina, Mike Easley-DEMOCRAT!)
http://money.cnn.com/2005/09/06/pf/taxes/gas_tax/?cnn=yes This will
give more info.
If the environmentalist wackos and the Liberal Democrats would allow
us to drill for the oil we know is in our own country, we could cut
our dependence on foreign sources drastically!! How about some new refineries after 25-30 years of not building any! If the Liberal
Democrats cry that "GWB went to war in Iraq just for oil, why in the
hell would he not be passing it out freely now to quiet his critics???
Guess whoever started this email thought everyone was to pass it on
without further comment. Sorry, but I am tired of this sort of email
being sent!
URGENT 9-10-05 NO GAS DAY
Subject: 9/10/05 Gas Boycott
IT HAS BEEN CALCULATED THAT IF EVERYONE IN THE UNITED STATES DID NOT
PURCHASE A DROP OF GASOLINE FOR ONE DAY AND ALL AT THE SAME TIME, THE
OIL COMPANIES WOULD CHOKE ON THEIR STOCKPILES.
AT THE SAME TIME IT WOULD HIT THE ENTIRE INDUSTRY WITH A NET LOSS OF
OVER 4.6 BILLION DOLLARS WHICH AFFECTS THE BOTTOM LINES OF THE OIL
COMPANIES.
THEREFORE Sept 10TH HAS BEEN FORMALLY DECLARED "STICK IT TO THEM DAY"
AND THE PEOPLE OF THIS NATION SHOULD NOT BUY A SINGE DROP OF GASOLINE
THAT DAY.
THE ONLY WAY THIS CAN BE DONE IS IF YOU FORWARD THIS E-MAIL TO AS
MANY PEOPLE A S YOU CAN AND AS QUICKLY AS YOU CAN TO GET THE WORD OUT.
WAITING ON THIS ADMINISTRATION TO STEP IN AND CONTROL THE PRICES IS
NOT GOING TO HAPPEN. WHAT HAPPENED TO THE REDUCTION AND CONTROL IN
PRICES THAT THE ARAB NATIONS PROMISED TWO WEEKS AGO?
REMEMBER ONE THING, NOT ONLY IS THE PRICE OF GASOLINE GOING UP BUT AT
THE SAME TIME AIRLINES ARE FORCED TO RAISE THEIR PRICES, TRUCKING
COMPANIES ARE FORCED TO RAISE THEIR PRICES WHICH EFFECTS PRICES ON
EVERYTHING THAT IS SHIPPED. THINGS LIKE FOOD, CLOTHING, BUILDING
MATERIALS, MEDICAL SUPPLIES ETC. WHO PAYS IN THE END? WE DO!
WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE. IF THEY DON'T GET THE MESSAGE AFTER ONE
DAY, WE WILL DO IT AGAIN AND AGAIN.
SO DO YOUR PART AND SPREAD THE WORD. FORWARD
__________________________________________________
Thanks.
Second: What is your suggested cure for a non-competitive over-priced market? It sure seems as if you are saying price gouging restrictions -- which are in fact a form of price control -- is your cure. But if that is so, then your belief statements are in complete contradiction. Can you explain how they would not be, for surely you think they are not.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.