Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: feedback doctor
I may be wrong but in this re-alignment process, the US Govt IS saying they don't want fighter pilots form Conn.

As I understand the controversy, it is a matter of numbers..
Connecticut has only a few fighters at their base due to the present commitment in Iraq..
That number is less than the number considered "efficient" for maintenance..
The government's solution is to move those planes to another base, and reach a combined total of planes that is more cost-efficient for maintaining them..

I agree with the idea..
Less cost and man-hours per plane if a certain ratio is maintained.. lower budget costs..

However, I don't think they intended on getting rid of the CT ANG pilots, but having them transported in to New Jersey, or whereever the other base is..
That's unconstitutional.. If they want to use CT ANG pilots, they have to provide for training in CT.. not NJ..
They can close the base if they want, but they can't make the pilots move to NJ, and they can't use them without an airbase in CT.. ( with an exception of 2 weeks every year.. )
That's the law..
And, like I said to the other poster, there are actual constitutional requirements that have to be met..
There are federal responsibilities, and there are State's Rights..
And there is a conflict..

Quite frankly, I understand the States want the money, etc..
But they also want to maintain their power and authority..

This could become a Supreme Court case very easily..

10 posted on 09/07/2005 11:40:22 PM PDT by Drammach (Freedom; not just a job, it's an adventure..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Drammach

What if the current CT pilots are not from Connecticut but fly in from out of state to drill? One does not have to be a resident of the state in which one belongs to a guard unit.


11 posted on 09/07/2005 11:55:44 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (When a Jihadist dies, an angel gets its wings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Drammach

That's unconstitutional.. If they want to use CT ANG pilots, they have to provide for training in CT.. not NJ..
They can close the base if they want, but they can't make the pilots move to NJ, and they can't use them without an airbase in CT.. ( with an exception of 2 weeks every year.. )

Wanna bet? What makes me think that your point of view will not be upheld. Common sense makes me think it.


12 posted on 09/07/2005 11:58:45 PM PDT by flaglady47
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Drammach

The thing I never saw explained is why should a state pay for an Air National Guard they don't have?

I can still see where smaller states can be combined with other states to have a larger force, but major changes will have to be made.

Still the cuts are necessary. Most of these bases were set up to meet early Cold War threats. Not only have the threats changed, but today's aircraft have a longer range than even their first models. The F-22 and F-35 are going to be highly expensive compared to current aircraft.


15 posted on 09/08/2005 12:18:36 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult ("Of the four wars in my lifetime, none came about because the U.S. was too strong." - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson