Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

World War III: Four Years and Counting
Jewish World Review ^ | 9-7-05 | Steven Stalinsky

Posted on 09/07/2005 5:03:07 AM PDT by SJackson

The Arab press — not only what they are saying to the West, but what they are whispering to each other. We believe you will be sickened. But you will certainly better understand the war on terror and what we are up against

The war against the West which was brought to the U.S. on September 11, 2001 has continued throughout the world in places such as Spain and London — which has been referred to by leading Arab writers as "a chapter in World War III". The attacks have included slitting throats, beheadings, blowing up planes, trains, and buses and are purposely brutal to instill terror. One notable example includes the suicide car bombing of a crowd of children receiving candy from U.S. soldiers in Iraq, killing 24 of them on July 14, 2005.

As the fourth anniversary of 9/11 approaches it is worth reviewing what President Bush said to the American people on September 15, 2001: "This is a conflict without battlefields … a conflict with opponents who believe they are invisible… Victory against terrorism will not take place in a single battle, but in a series of decisive actions … You will be asked for your patience; for, the conflict will not be short… You will be asked for your strength, because the course to victory may be long…"

It is also important not to forget 9/11 took a long time to plan and implement as Al-Qaeda has promised more attacks are on the way. As a reminder, last month we heard from Osama bin Laden's deputy Ayman al-Zawahiri twice including August 4th on Al-Jazzera: "Oh Americans, what you have seen in New York and Washington… are nothing but the casualties of the initial clashes…"

(Excerpt) Read more at jewishworldreview.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 09/07/2005 5:03:08 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"This is a conflict without battlefields … a conflict with opponents who believe they are invisible… Victory against terrorism will not take place in a single battle, but in a series of decisive actions … You will be asked for your patience; for, the conflict will not be short… You will be asked for your strength, because the course to victory may be long…"

I remember the President saying this from the beginning. How quickly so many Americans want to forget and return to their pre-9/11 lives.

2 posted on 09/07/2005 5:05:38 AM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
He explained what is was like being in New York on 9/11 to an Arab audience who laughed with him when he described "how beautiful" it was as the World Trade Center fell and the reaction of the "wretched" American people who quickly embraced Islam.

They don't want us to respect their religion. They want to kill us.

3 posted on 09/07/2005 5:08:41 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
I've heard people call the War against Terrorism World War III before - and I don't agree with that characterization. Although the War Against Terror is important and necessary it IMO is not WWIII. We haven't even declared war against anybody. We fought against the Taliban regime and the Hussein regime, but we were careful not to call it a war against Afghanistan and Iraq. In fact, except for watching the news, most American people would not even know we were in a war.
Compare this to WWII. People were involved with that war in their daily lives. It was a day to day struggle. A group of countries were fighting another group of countries in declared war. It was all consuming for everyone. Nobody was concerned with getting to the store early enough to get the newest model of flat-screened TV's before their neighbor, or being the first person in their school to get a Honda CBR, etc.
4 posted on 09/07/2005 5:46:15 AM PDT by loreldan (Lincoln, Reagan, & G. W. Bush - the cure for Democrat lunacy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: loreldan

No doubt, many of the citizens of ancient Rome also found it hard to believe that the influx of barbarians constituted a "war".

Too bad for them, eh?


5 posted on 09/07/2005 6:13:13 AM PDT by pfony1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pfony1

Yes, and liberals who whine -- "Make it stop. Take the troops home" -- how little they get it.


6 posted on 09/07/2005 6:22:35 AM PDT by bboop (Refugees ... refugees ... refugees ... Come and get me, Jesse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

WW I 1914-1918
WW II 1939-1945
WW III 1949-1990 apx. (Cold War)
WW IV 2001- date (Islamofacist War)

It is interesting to note former soviet cells morphed from cold war into the current conflict. Domestic forces still strive to undermine, disrupt and destroy our capialistic way of life.


7 posted on 09/07/2005 6:24:25 AM PDT by Broker (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pfony1
I did call this a "war" and a necessary one. I just said it was not a World War. The analogy of the Romans is a bad one anyway. The barbarians fighting the Romans was also not a World War.
8 posted on 09/07/2005 6:24:56 AM PDT by loreldan (Lincoln, Reagan, & G. W. Bush - the cure for Democrat lunacy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pfony1
No doubt, many of the citizens of ancient Rome also found it hard to believe that the influx of barbarians constituted a "war".

It was more like an indolent cancer... slow decay with a dramatic finish. Not unlike the West's attitude towards immigration and multiculturalism today.

9 posted on 09/07/2005 6:25:17 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: loreldan
Compare this to WWII. People were involved with that war in their daily lives.

WWII did not happen over night. It took several years of dealing with Hitler and others before it finally turned into a war. I'm not sure where we will end up but am glad we are taking preemptive strikes.

Another point to consider is that the goal was UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER during WWII. If a negotiated peace had been done it would have only deferred the problem.
10 posted on 09/07/2005 6:54:51 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Broker
WW I 1914-1918
WW II 1939-1945
WW III 1949-1990 apx. (Cold War)
WW IV 2001- date (Islamofacist War)


I'm not sure why people enjoy being so dramatic over these terms. Plainly, the two world wars actually drew in all branches of the armed forces of all the major countries in formally declared warfare under their national governments. Their economies and citenzy were fully mobilized for total warfare, not a guns-and-butter war.

The confinement and economic strangulation of Soviet expansionism was certainly a policy. But it was not a shooting war. There are no WW III veterans. Warfare by proxy (Korea, Vietnam) does not qualify and no historian or military expert apply the term.

As for the War On Terror, it is much more comparable to the international efforts against the bomb-throwing anarchists and assassins prior to WW I. The archduke's assassination was the result of anarchist plotting and was the last major action they instigated, the spark that began WW I.

The most likely candidate for WW III is a conflict with China, largely over oil and resources and land and their desperation to continue their communist dictatorship.
11 posted on 09/07/2005 6:55:22 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

I have am a certified documented veteran of the cold war. Many people died in that global effort. Just tried to put war & conflict into historical context.


12 posted on 09/07/2005 7:00:39 AM PDT by Broker (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Broker
Certainly I'm not suggesting that many did not serve in the military or die valiant deaths for our country during the Cold War. I would not compare world war vets to Cold War vets in that way.

I just think the two world wars are a special case with very significant defining features.

Strictly speaking, we haven't even declared a war since 1941. At present, we don't even have a recognized Al-Qaeda government and territory upon which we could declare war. What we have is an international effort by police with some military assistance to stop the terrorists, just as they did when they crushed the old anarchists.

Well, I'm sure you know the arguments by heart...
13 posted on 09/07/2005 7:11:16 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Broker

Thank you, that needed to be pointed out.


14 posted on 09/07/2005 7:26:04 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle (God has blessed Republicans with really stupid enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: loreldan

This war is more like the Cold War, and is going to take (at least) that long.


15 posted on 09/07/2005 9:02:25 AM PDT by Valin (The right to do something does not mean that doing it is right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

They need "a rain of ruin", not "Meals on Wheels".


16 posted on 09/07/2005 9:36:38 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson