Replies

It appears the European Commission wants Microsoft to release their source code, but MS does not want to allow open source projects to have it.

Not exactly. They want the communications protocols to be open. That's a big difference. It's about interoperability.

Not exactly. They want the communications protocols to be open. That's a big difference. It's about interoperability.

Yeah, but "open" doesn't come without a price. There's a license fee associated with the protocol information. Microsoft obviously wants to prevent open source licensors from gaining access to the protocols and then releasing the information publicly; either in source code or documentation form. If OSS licensors were to do that, MS suing them wouldn't help a whole lot, because the code and/or documentation would be widely disseminated and undoubtedly incorporated into countless projects; if not directly, then through careful analysis of the code. Personally, I don't blame MS or IBM or any other big company that wants to keep its IP private. Handing it over to OSS folks would be like injecting it into the public domain without reasonable compensation.

Not exactly. They want the communications protocols to be open. That's a big difference. It's about interoperability.

Interoperability is a good thing, and I'd prefer to see the protocol specifications published.

However, according to Dow Jones Newswires, the specific issue in this lawsuit is about source code.