Posted on 09/06/2005 12:18:05 AM PDT by Mount Athos
The physical devastation caused by hurricane Katrina has painfully revealed the moral devastation of our times that has led to mass looting in New Orleans, assaults on people in shelters, the raping of girls, and shots being fired at helicopters that are trying to rescue people.
Forty years ago, an electric grid failure plunged New York and other northeastern cities into a long blackout. But law and order prevailed. Ordinary citizens went to intersections to direct traffic. People helped each other. After the blackout was over, this experience left many people with an upbeat spirit about their fellow human beings.
Another blackout in New York, years later, was much uglier. And what has been happening now in New Orleans is uglier still. Is there a trend here?
Fear, grief, desperation or despair would be understandable in people whose lives have been devastated by events beyond their control. Regret might be understandable among those who were warned to evacuate before the hurricane hit but who chose to stay. Yet the word being heard from those on the scene is "angry."
That may be a clue, not only to the breakdown of decency in New Orleans, but to a wider degeneration in American society in recent decades.
Why are people angry? And at whom?
Apparently they are angry at government officials for not having rescued them sooner, or taken care of them better, or for letting law and order break down.
No doubt the inevitable post mortems on this tragic episode will turn up many cases where things could have been done better. But who can look back honestly at his own life without seeing many things that could have been done better?
Just thinking about all the mistakes you have made over a lifetime can be an experience that is humbling, if not humiliating.
When all is said and done, government is ultimately just human beings -- politicians, judges, bureaucrats. Maybe the reason we are so often disappointed with them is that they have over-promised and we have been gullible enough to believe them.
Government cannot solve all our problems, even in normal times, much less during a catastrophe of nature that reminds man how little he is, despite all his big talk.
The most basic function of government, maintaining law and order, breaks down when floods or blackouts paralyze the system.
During good times or bad, the police cannot police everybody. They can at best control a small segment of society. The vast majority of people have to control themselves.
That is where the great moral traditions of a society come in -- those moral traditions that it is so hip to sneer at, so cute to violate, and that our very schools undermine among the young, telling them that they have to evolve their own standards, rather than following what old fuddy duddies like their parents tell them.
Now we see what those do-it-yourself standards amount to in the ugliness and anarchy of New Orleans.
In a world where people flaunt their "independence," their "right" to disregard moral authority, and sometimes legal authority as well, the tragedy of New Orleans reminds us how utterly dependent each one of us is for our very lives on millions of other people we don't even see.
Thousands of people in New Orleans will be saved because millions of other people they don't even know are moved by moral obligations to come to their rescue from all corners of this country. The things our clever sophisticates sneer at are ultimately all that stand between any of us and utter devastation.
Any of us could have been in New Orleans. And what could we have depended on to save us? Situational ethics? Postmodern philosophy? The media? The lawyers? The rhetoric of the intelligentsia?
No, what we would have to depend on are the very things that are going to save the survivors of hurricane Katrina, the very things that clever people are undermining.
New Orleans can be rebuilt and the levees around it shored up. But can the moral levees be shored up, not only in New Orleans but across America?
A letter to editor I wrote to the Seattle Times, that they actually printed this last Sunday along side all the it's Bush's falt letters.
The massive damage to New Orleans cause by hurricane Katrina is most certainly one of the worse natural disasters to hit this great nation. The scenes being played out on TV are horrific to watch, and for us to visualize the cities recovery is almost unimaginable. But this is not the first time large cities have been destroyed in this country by like-disasters. Two that come to mind are Chicago in its 1871 fire and San Francisco which was destroyed by an earthquake and fire in 1906. Both disasters wiped out thousands of homes and business and left tens of thousands of people homeless. Both cities were plagued by looters, frustrated survivors, worries of disease, starvation and pestilence, and both had many doubters that the cities could ever be rebuilt.
Both cities were rebuilt, and grander than they ever were. So it will be with New Orleans. This is America, we are survivors.
New Orleans is not an artificial city. It has been around for almost 300 years. From 1803 until 1861, New Orleans' population increased from 8,000 to nearly 170,000. The 1810 census revealed a population of 10,000 making New Orleans the United States' fifth largest city, after New York, Philadelphia, Boston, and Baltimore and the largest city west of the Appalachians. From 1810 until 1840, New Orleans grew at a faster rate than any other large American city.
By 1830, New Orleans was America's third largest city, behind New York and Baltimore; and in 1860, it was still the nation's fifth largest city. New Orleans, despite the Post-Civil War boom that transformed the North into an urban-industrial area, would remain among the twelve largest U.S. cities until 1910.
Today the Port of New Orleans' throughput is the largest of any port in America. Approximately, 20% of our oil and gas come from the area. New Orleans is vital to the economic health of the region and America.
Pierce Lewis, perhaps its most knowledgeable scholar, describes New Orleans as the "inevitable city on an impossible site." It is a tribute to the ingenuity and greatness of Americans that a great city could be built and then flourish. NO will be rebuilt bigger and better. Count on it.
Granted, trade and commerce make some sort of port city necessary at the mouth of the Mississippi. It follows that trade and commerce are best suited to rebuild the city which they need. The government's role should be subordinate to these overarching interests, it should not ordain a new New Orleans by fiat. The New Orleans which you speak of is, for all intents and purposes, gone with the wind. Regretable, but so are a lot of other things.
Reconstructing Neworleansland on the old site might interest Disney but resiting the new city on higher ground makes more sense. Finally, I see no reason why taxpayers in other states should contribute any more than a minimum amount of Federal dollars to cater to nostalgia. We're already being tagged plenty for cleaning up the mess.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.