Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chief justice favored Roberts
THE WASHINGTON TIMES ^ | September 6, 2005 | By Guy Taylor

Posted on 09/05/2005 10:54:30 PM PDT by Kay

Judge John G. Roberts Jr. was long regarded as the best Supreme Court lawyer in the nation by the very man whose shoes President Bush has chosen him to fill.

Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, who died Saturday, played a key role in shaping Judge Roberts by making him a pupil during the early 1980s and propelling his career as a lawyer and federal judge in subsequent years.

Ted Cruz, who clerked for Chief Justice Rehnquist during the mid-1990s, recalled that he and fellow clerks once asked their boss whom he considered to be the most superior Supreme Court litigator.

.....

When Mr. Bush nominated Judge Roberts to replace outgoing Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, some suggested that it might have been more poetic had Judge Roberts been nominated to replace Chief Justice Rehnquist, because it was under the chief justice's wing that his career in Washington blossomed.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chiefjustice; rehnquist; roberts; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 09/05/2005 10:54:30 PM PDT by Kay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kay

For all we know, perhaps Rehnquist suggested Roberts to Bush personally.


2 posted on 09/05/2005 10:56:34 PM PDT by SteveMcKing ("I was born a Democrat. I expect I'll be a Democrat the day I leave this earth." -Zell Miller '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

I'm thinking that's a really good guess


3 posted on 09/05/2005 10:56:52 PM PDT by Mount Athos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kay
Sometimes I wonder why some important positions like this have to be so political. Why can't people just look out for whats good for the country instead of their own little slice of the pie? I hope roberts goes through as smoothly as Ginsberg.
4 posted on 09/05/2005 10:59:46 PM PDT by Meadow Muffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Meadow Muffin

Ditto.


5 posted on 09/05/2005 11:01:36 PM PDT by Kay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kay

I hope Dershowitz has to try a case before Roberts.


6 posted on 09/05/2005 11:15:37 PM PDT by claudiustg (Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kay

No, it would have been most poetic to have Rehnquist swear in Roberts. Some things were not meant to be, I suppose.


7 posted on 09/05/2005 11:17:07 PM PDT by AmishDude (Join the AmishDude fan club: "Great point." -- AliVertias; ":-) Very clever" -- MJY1288)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg

Dershowitz! No class. No tact. Denigrated Chief Justice Rehnquist on the very night he died.

What goes around comes around.


8 posted on 09/05/2005 11:17:30 PM PDT by Kay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kay

Now that Roberts is being nominated as "Chief Justice to the Supreme Court" instead of plain old "Supreme Court Justice", the Democrats in the Senate will need lots more time to "reconsider" the nomination because this CHANGES EVERYTHING.

But they'll put that on hold because now they need to get on with the REALLY important business of the Senate, like holding hearings on why George Bush used hurricane Katrina to murder African-Americans living in New Orleans while helping his oil buddies price gouge at the gasoline pump.







(I pity the fool who needs the sarcasm tag.)


9 posted on 09/05/2005 11:17:46 PM PDT by spinestein (Forget the Golden Rule. Remember the Brazen Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kay



Obviously Ann Coulter never talked with the Chief about John G Roberts, Jr.


10 posted on 09/05/2005 11:18:22 PM PDT by msnimje (CNN - Constant Negative Nonsense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kay
I like this quote from Jonathan Turley who obviously hates John G. Roberts.

No, the court is not likely to change John Roberts, but Roberts will almost certainly change the court.
11 posted on 09/05/2005 11:20:17 PM PDT by msnimje (CNN - Constant Negative Nonsense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

What makes you say that Jonathan Turley hates Roberts?


12 posted on 09/05/2005 11:21:59 PM PDT by Kay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kay

Hate might be to strong a word.


http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2005-08-30-roberts_x.htm


13 posted on 09/05/2005 11:28:50 PM PDT by msnimje (CNN - Constant Negative Nonsense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing; nopardons
For all we know, perhaps Rehnquist suggested Roberts to Bush personally.

That's a very distinct possibility that I hadn't thought of before.

14 posted on 09/05/2005 11:33:05 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (Liberalism is a form of insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

Thanks for the info.

Had dinner with several relatives tonight after work. 2 of them think that Bush will lose Roberts now that he is renominated to Chief Justice. But when I asked them who they thought Bush should have nominated, they had no answer.


15 posted on 09/05/2005 11:33:08 PM PDT by Kay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kay
Had dinner with several relatives tonight after work. 2 of them think that Bush will lose Roberts now that he is renominated to Chief Justice

The Dems trapped themselves. When SDO announced her retirement they anointed her and said the PRES cannot replace a Woman swing vote with a white male conservative. Now he is replacing one white male conservative with another. They have no ammunition against him.

16 posted on 09/05/2005 11:46:01 PM PDT by msnimje (CNN - Constant Negative Nonsense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

Hope so.


17 posted on 09/05/2005 11:52:00 PM PDT by Kay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: spinestein

"(I pity the fool who needs the sarcasm tag.)"

LOL! I'll drink to tha-a-a-a.........say what???

I pity the fool who needs the sarcasm tag for that.


18 posted on 09/06/2005 12:02:44 AM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (If it can't be used to discredit Bush or cover a Dem's sorry ass, it ain't newsworthy to the MSM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

"I like this quote from Jonathan Turley who obviously hates John G. Roberts.

No, the court is not likely to change John Roberts, but Roberts will almost certainly change the court."

That could go either way.


19 posted on 09/06/2005 12:16:14 AM PDT by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper; SteveMcKing

That's something I have been thinking as well, but I never posted. After all, Roberts WAS Rehnquist's clerk and I assume they got to know each other pretty well.


20 posted on 09/06/2005 12:27:15 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson