It's hardly that simple. Are the lives of the rapists, the looters, the shooters-at-rescuers, worth more than the life of a good faithful dog?
In any case, I agree with those who point out that real-world rescues are hardly as starkly simple a choice as "one or the other lives, and the other dies". Only in the most ridiculously contrived hypotheticals would saving an animal along with its owner actually condemn some other human to death.
On any thread regarding animals, there are always those willing to surf by and hurl a puppy bomb into the discussion. No one on the thread has yet replied that they consider animal life above or equal to human life, they just share a common concern about the critters of this world caught in the same disaster as their betters. No one has posted "Save Dogs Not People!", nor "Save the Cats, Let the People Drown!". No, no one on this forum has posted such nonsense. Just their concern and the hope that consideration can be shown to God's lessor creatures when time and resource permit.
But then, some dick-head always has to swagger in on the thread, hike his pants up to his belly, spit and declare in a condescending manner, what is already obvious to all.
The only contribution these people make to such a thread with their "reality check", is to inform one and all that they have a superiority complex. The only information that they impart to the discussion that is of any value , is that they are a poster who needs to be avoided and ignored.
Now, don't you have some kittens to drown?!