Posted on 09/04/2005 12:45:08 AM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
The National Guard was slow to move troops into New Orleans because it did not anticipate the collapse of the city's police force after Hurricane Katrina, the guard's commander said.
Lieutenant General Steven Blum said the New Orleans police force was left with only a third of its pre-storm 1,500-person strength.
Some police had families caught up in the disaster, others were unable to make it back to their precincts because of the flooding, and yet others left their posts after deciding the situation had grown too dangerous.
"The real issue, particularly in New Orleans, is that no one anticipated the disintegration or the erosion of the civilian police force in New Orleans," Blum told reporters here.
"Once that assessment was made ... then the requirement became obvious," he said. "And that's when we started flowing military police into the theater."
On Friday, New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin angrily denounced the slow federal response as too little, too late, charging that promised troops had not arrived in time.
"Now get off your asses and let's do something and fix the biggest goddamn crisis in the history of this country," the mayor said in remarks aired on CNN.
Blum said that since Thursday some 7,000 National Guard and military police had moved into the city.
But he said any suggestion that the National Guard had not performed well or was late was a "low blow."
The initial priority of the Louisiana and Mississippi National Guard forces was disaster relief, not law enforcement, because they expected the police to handle that, he said.
"We were pulsing forces in in very degraded infrastructure -- airports had reduced capabilities ... in some cases we only had one road in because of lack of bridges, flooding, loss of infrastructure," he said.
"So we couldn't rush to failure on this thing and we had to take a more measured approach on this thing than any of us wanted," he said.
When it became apparent that disorder in New Orleans should be the most immediate priority, the National Guard waited until they had enough forces in hand to make an overwhelming show of force, he said.
On Friday, while President George W. Bush was touring the stricken city, 1,000 military police and National Guard stormed the convention center where street gangs mixed in with thousands of others awaiting rescue had created a volatile situation, Blum said.
"Had we gone in with a lesser force we may have been challenged, innocents may have been caught in a fight between the guard and military police and those who did not want to be processed or apprehended," he said.
Bush, under intense criticism for the slow federal response, on Saturday ordered an additional 7,000 active duty and reserve ground troops to reinforce the National Guard.
That would raise the level of US military forces committed to the relief effort -- active duty as well as national guard and reserves -- to more than 50,000 by the end of next week.
Blum said that on Saturday there were 27,000 national guard troops in Louisiana and Mississippi. That number will grow to about 40,000 within the next week, he said.
There were varying estimates of the number of active duty troops already in the area as part of the relief of operations before Bush's order.
Major General Joseph Inge, deputy commander of the US Northern Command, put the number of active duty forces already on the ground at nearly 5,000 while Blum estimated the active force at 7,000, including sailors aboard navy ships.
The additional troops ordered in from the active force include 2,500 soldiers from the 82nd Airborne Division, 2,700 from the 1st Cavalry Division and 2,000 from the 1st and 2nd Marine Expeditionary Forces.
"Censorship can only be done by the Gov't."
The above is not true. The TV networks have censors. Hollywood films were censored for many years--by a production code. Neither is/was done by the gov't.
Technically, what you are describing is editing
True censorship requires the force of law behind it.
I've loved them all!
Relax......as you no doubt have access to many fine items of interest we will look forward to your many future posts.
"Technically, what you are describing is editing."
I guess that's why the TV networks call them censors. It's not editing. The censors literally stand by to bleep out any unwanted comments.
You came in in Nov. 2004....they definitely had rules then!
"Hey, What about me?" (/sarcasm)
now that's funny
The networks don't even call them censors, but use the term "Standards and Practices". Only the uneducated use the term, 'censor' when describing voluntary restraint.
Only a government can truly censor you.
Hey! I bet it's Karl Roves fault. He's trying to make the Iraqi police force appear more stable.
Rule of holes: When you're in one, quit diggin'...
Listen...its early in the morning..you are tired lay off and go to bed. Don't get your-self banned!
The Federal Government,as well as separate states, had, since the beginning of this nation, laws which not only censored written pornography, but also what was and was not allowed to be said on stage, in a play. BLUE LAWS is not just the name of an old band!
Not only are you a whiny, arrogant, thumb your nose at the rules poster, but you're rapidly approaching Crazy Cindy Sheehan status on this thread. If you're a Conservative, then I'm the Queen of England.......VICTORIA REGINA !
LOL!
"You came in in Nov. 2004....they definitely had rules then!"
I posted many, many articles about the 2004 election without having to use the biased news service headlines (AP, Reuters, AFP). If these rules were in effect then, they certainly weren't enforced.
That is interesting. CYA mode?
I suspect the full story is yet to be told.
Dismissal. It is quite firmly established (for more than a century) that the police have no responsibility to do much more than make records of criminal complaints. They are not under any legal obligation to protect you.
Even if that were true, it does not change the fact that these rules are being enforced now.
For the love of all the gods, drop it already.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.