Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Congressman Billybob

If the President wants to nominate Judge Roberts as the Chief, does he do that now (before the hearings next week?)


959 posted on 09/03/2005 9:44:14 PM PDT by msnimje (CNN - Constant Negative Nonsense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 633 | View Replies ]


To: msnimje
When anyone is nominated directly as Chief Justice, rather than being an Associate Justice first, there is only one Senate hearing. However, the rare few who have been nominated directly as Chief have usually held some substantial position prior to that.

Think William Howard Taft, who was named Chief after he had served as President of the US. Judge Roberts doesn't have the horsepower to be named directly as Chief. So my answer to your question is purely theoretical. IF Bush decided to nominate Roberts for Chief, he would withdraw the current nomination as Associate, and replace it with one for Chief. Then, the hearings would proceed as scheduled.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column: "Tide of Lies Swamps NY Times: Employees Riot and Steal Office Supplies"

1,051 posted on 09/03/2005 10:01:45 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (My tagline is on vacation, lying in the hammock with a cold beer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 959 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson