DoughtyOne wrote:
Too bad you had to pee on the parade with your annoyance that a post you made yesterday was pulled. Perhaps there was a good reason for pulling it; perhaps it displayed the same temperment that this current reply of yours displayed. Perhaps it was a total mistake that your post was pulled; in which case you could take it easy on whatever admin botched it, and take some delight that your wisdom saw the light of day anyway, over another posters signature.
This current post is a good one. I trust it stays. Thanks, Chief Engineer.
DoughtyOne wrote:
My post saying the same damned thing
Too bad you had to pee on the parade with your annoyance that a post you made yesterday was pulled. Perhaps there was a good reason for pulling it; perhaps it displayed the same temperment that this current reply of yours displayed. Perhaps it was a total mistake that your post was pulled; in which case you could take it easy on whatever admin botched it, and take some delight that your wisdom saw the light of day anyway, over another posters signature.
Why should my temperament be any different? If something is important, and after forty years of welfare state failure, I believe this is, why should I be pleased that this issue was swept under the carpet one more time?
I did not take an individual moderater to task. I merely told the truth. In reading that truth, I would hope some might understand that the posting of fact, is not something to be labeled racism. By removing my post, I was labeled a racist. I didn't appreciate that and still don't.
Chief Engineer didn't write this article. It was attributed to another person. I certainly don't have any problem with this issue being aired under anyone's name. I do however think it a good idea to leave reasoned comments on the forum next time, instead of making implications that are totally untrue.