Skip to comments.
Yahoo News Excludes Salvation Army from Hurricane Donation Links [BIAS ALERT]
Yahoo ^
| September 3, 2005
| nwrep
Posted on 09/03/2005 1:17:47 PM PDT by nwrep
In a display of blatant left-wing, anti-Christian bias, Yahoo has excluded The Salvation Army from its links of charities helping with rescue efforts.
Here are the organizations Yahoo has provided links for:
* American Red Cross
* Network for Good: Hurricane Katrina
* Habitat for Humanity
* NSALA: Hurricane Katrina Animal Rescue
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: katrina; salvationarmy; yahoo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
To: nwrep
Yahoo's home search page has Huffington Blog on there and nothing from the other side. That pretty much sums up their position.
41
posted on
09/03/2005 1:39:54 PM PDT
by
msnimje
(TAKE CNN OFF YOUR REMOTE - THEY ARE THE ENEMY OF THE US)
To: nwrep
They also stiffed "Feed The Chidren", another Christian group, who were in there within twelve hours (while others were debating and considering and dithering) providing food and necessities. Fie on those Lefty Antichrists!
42
posted on
09/03/2005 1:40:08 PM PDT
by
RoadTest
(For Heaven's Sake)
To: nwrep
I also heard that Yahoo was donating additional bandwidth to the Red Cross because they were being swamped.
43
posted on
09/03/2005 1:40:12 PM PDT
by
oldbrowser
(no one is right because no one is wrong)
To: nwrep
"* Habitat for Humanity"
Something Jimmy Carter is good at, at least.
44
posted on
09/03/2005 1:41:06 PM PDT
by
Shermy
To: nwrep
45
posted on
09/03/2005 1:42:30 PM PDT
by
Rightly Biased
(<>< Like $3 a gallon gas? Thank an enviromentalist.)
To: nk_47
Yes, it is. I admire it very greatly because it DOES something rahter than blabbering on and on about damnation and salvation.
46
posted on
09/03/2005 1:42:31 PM PDT
by
stboz
To: OldFriend
To: HitmanNY
My Dad needed funds for emergency leave during ww2 the red cross turned him down but the salvation army came thru with flying colors,later on he was employed at a boat yard as a carpenter a large boat came in for repairs he found out it was owned by a red cross district manager and that was his only job my dad figured if he can have a boat of that size on his salary he didnt need any donation from him.
48
posted on
09/03/2005 1:45:12 PM PDT
by
bikerman
To: stboz
Yes, it is. I admire it very greatly because it DOES something rahter than blabbering on and on about damnation and salvation.Who do you admire? Habitat for Humanity? Who blabbers on about damnation & salvation? Get your story straight, please.
Don't even suggest that the Salvation Army doesn't DO anything!
To: jackbill
As for the Red Cross, how do you know that a donation will be used for the hurricane/flood? Remember how, after 9/11 we found out that the Red Cross was using many of the donations for their "general funds"?
That's one reason why I do not donate via Red Cross. The Salvation Army allowed me to designate my funds to hurricane relief, right on the donation page.
To: madison10
I wasn't aware that Yahoo was a search engine
51
posted on
09/03/2005 1:48:10 PM PDT
by
RantEng
(A father of young adults)
To: Rightly Biased
You're telling me.
I clicked on their 'photographs from World War 2' link and the first picture was the memorial somewhere in the west for Japanese-American internment camps.
To: OldFriend
Salvation Army and Walmart are doing a good service. The CEO of Target stores decided to ban Salvation Army bell ringers from their 1,272 stores nationwide last Christmas, costing that charity an estimated $9 million or 10% of their funds raised during Christmas. What a jerk that CEO of Target was.
53
posted on
09/03/2005 1:50:20 PM PDT
by
FreeRep
To: RantEng
I wasn't aware that Yahoo was a search engineGood. LOL Don't bother with it. At least Google has not yet come out AGAINST the Salvation Army.
If I keep reading this stuff my blood pressure is going to skyrocket...GRRRHH
To: squarebarb
Friends don't let friends use yahoo.
55
posted on
09/03/2005 1:51:50 PM PDT
by
Rightly Biased
(<>< Like $3 a gallon gas? Thank an enviromentalist.)
To: nwrep
I talked with my wife today and we both agreed that the SA is the right one for us to contribute relief money.
To: nwrep
At least they don't have a link to the totally worthless United Way.
57
posted on
09/03/2005 1:56:51 PM PDT
by
upchuck
("If our nation be destroyed, it would be from the judiciary." ~ Thomas Jefferson)
To: oldbrowser
I wrote the Red Cross off when I saw them participating in an anti-war on terror protest at Santa Monica College. The protest was put on by the "Progessive Alliance with the leadership of the tax-payer funded women's studies instructors leading the way.
To: Jacquerie
They obviously forgot NAMBLA. LOL!!! too much..
59
posted on
09/03/2005 2:07:09 PM PDT
by
buckleyfan
(WFB, save us!)
To: MensRightsActivist
I wrote the Red Cross off when I saw them participating in an anti-war on terror protest at Santa Monica College. The protest was put on by the "Progessive Alliance with the leadership of the tax-payer funded women's studies instructors leading the way. It sees that these socialists have a plan to join well established (and well funded) non profit organizations and then worm there way up to the top where they slowly begin to turn the organization to their agenda.
60
posted on
09/03/2005 2:17:54 PM PDT
by
oldbrowser
(no one is right because no one is wrong)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson