Posted on 09/03/2005 9:29:01 AM PDT by BushCountry
The French Quarter was damaged by Katrina, but it was not destroyed, and tourists and residents let the good times roll and wondered why they were so lucky.
By ERIKA BOLSTAD
ebolstad@herald.com
NEW ORLEANS - At the start of hurricane season, the historic St. Louis Cathedral in the heart of the French Quarter offers a short prayer in the Sunday church bulletin to Our Lady of Prompt Succor.
Each year, the city's Catholics clip out the prayer, place it on their refrigerators and repeat the entreaty whenever a tropical depression appears in the Gulf of Mexico: Spare New Orleans from a direct hit by a hurricane.
**********
Another Story the Day after the storm:
http://www.clarionledger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050830/NEWS0110/508300384/1260
NEW ORLEANS Gail Henke could think of no better way to celebrate the French Quarter's survival of Hurricane Katrina than to belly up to a bar on Bourbon Street with a vodka and cranberry juice. Call it a libation to the storm gods.
"You know what? There's a reason why we're called the Saints," the 53-year-old tour booker said Monday as she communed with 20 or so other survivors. "Because no matter what religion you are, whether you're a Catholic, whether you're voodoo, whether you're Baptist or so on, so on, and so on we all pray. We all pray. I'm not a religious fanatic. But God has saved us."
************
Excerpt from a Tuesday morning story:
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/341577p-291681c.html
In New Orleans' historic French Quarter of Napoleonic-era buildings with wrought-iron balconies, water pooled in the streets from the driving rain, but the area appeared to have escaped the catastrophic flooding that forecasters had predicted.
On Jackson Square, two massive oak trees outside the 278-year-old St. Louis Cathedral came out by the roots, ripping out a 30-foot section of ornamental iron fence and straddling a marble statue of Jesus Christ, snapping off only the thumb and forefinger of his outstretched hand.
At the hotel Le Richelieu, the winds blew open sets of balcony French doors shortly after dawn. Seventy-three-year-old Josephine Elow of New Orleans pressed her weight against the broken doors as a hotel employee tried to secure them.
"It's not life-threatening," Mrs. Elow said as rain water dripped from her face. "God's got our back."
For years, forecasters have warned of the nightmare scenario a big storm could bring to New Orleans, a bowl of a city that is up to 10 feet below sea level in spots and relies on a network of levees, canals and pumps to keep dry from the Mississippi River on one side, Lake Pontchartrain on the other.
The fear was that flooding could overrun the levees and turn New Orleans into a toxic lake filled with chemicals and petroleum from refineries, as well as waste from ruined septic systems.
Officials said a levee broke on one canal, but did not appear to cause major problems.
Blanco took little comfort in the fact that the hurricane may have spared New Orleans much worse flooding, given the still uncertain toll in surrounding parishes.
"I can't say that I feel that sense that we've escaped the worst," she said. "I think we don't know what the worst is right now."
*********
Yet another story
http://www.wsav.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=WSAV/MGArticle/SAV_BasicArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1031784753009&path=!frontpage
Superdome Survives Katrina; Evacuees Finally Get to Breathe Fresh Air Associated Press Tuesday, August 30, 2005
The roof has holes and there are leaks everywhere but some people sheltering a second night at the Louisiana Superdome are thankful for one small sign of progress: a little fresh air.
As National Guardsmen watched to make sure they didn't leave, some refugees from Hurricane Katrina lined up for a stroll on the large walkway around the dome last night.
************
These buses could have been used while the flooding wasn't that bad!
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/050901/480/flpc21109012015
I'm 'not going there with you' as they say.
My post says nothing about Jesus having said 'pray to my Mother'.
I said She intercedes for us through her Son, to the Father himself.
Insofar as I can discern, the Father chose her to be the Mother, it was not Jesus himself who chose.
Whether you choose to call her 'woman' or 'Mother' does not diminish the role she had in bringing her Son into the world.
Especially if this driver was there, to show them how it's done.
Sorry for double post
BushCountry says, "It has been an amazing effort! Don't fall for the BIG LIE!!"
I too feel it has been an amazing effort. But it was extremely difficult on those trapped in the Super Dome and the Convention Center, and that made big news. The many, many positive heroic stories are not getting the same press.
bump
I think you have proven beyond any shadow of a doubt that your statement has no veracity.
Who told me that the Father chose her to be the Mother?
I think it is rather well known that Jesus did have an earthly Mother. Most call her 'Mary'.
By what name do you call her, if in fact you dispute her existence?
Good. Then if you finally are able to acknowledge after the roundabout and diversionary arguments you put forth about Her RELEVANCE and do acknowledge that She exists, then back to the original post: She intercedes for us when we ask just as any Mother would for their children which is what the ORIGINAL post was all about. I consider Her Mother of the Christian church.
I believe She intercedes as the church bulletin mentions because the people know to ask Her to do so.
Does your particular belief prohibit you from asking for intercession?
And don't misquote me either, as self righteous as you might wish to appear.
Take your particular self righteousness elsewhere; it has no effect on me except to show me you are narrow and rigid and have no tolerance for the belief of people such as those in New Orleans who are attempting to cling faith and beliefs which have sustained them in the past.
Call it what you will. You have taken an attitude of righteousness: that your posts are above reproach to all who would challenge them, or their true source.
Since we are agreed who Mary is, I will ask Her to INTERCEDE tonight to SOFTEN your heart regarding your disregard of the attitudes, beliefs and thoughts of OTHERS expressed here and elsewhere as opposed to your own self-proclaimed righteousness, wherever it may have come from (its source).
If you need to ask why I say this, go back through your recent posts, not only those rudely posted to me, but also the recent one about the City of N.O. and 'lowering its standards to allow minorities to qualify' for the police force.
If you will pay attention to the news, the police officers there have committed suicide, turned in their badges, or walked off the job for a variety of reasons: severe depression, hopelessness at the situation at hand, overwhelmed at the grief, trying to help people who were begging for food or water days on end, having lost their own homes to the flooding, having lost their children or spouses in the aftermath (missing or dead,) attempting to help abandoned pets, 20 hour shifts, dead friends and neighbors in their own street, not able to GET to work with the flooding.
What does THAT have to do with being a 'minority', or a police force which (allegedly) lowered its standards to admit them? Did they succumb to depression or hopelessness because they are 'minorities'?
When you boldly approach the Throne, I wonder what response you will offer for 'posts' such as these in your threads?
May God bless you and keep you; may He heal all your sicknesses and bless you with more money than you can handle.
Once again, in post 56, as in post 55 and post 52, the cloak of righteousness has verily thrown a mantle of protection around you, hasn't it? You can throw any un-CHRISTIAN 'flame' you wish under the guise of 'righteousness' and believe you are above reproach for having done so.
Seems to suit you well.
The Father, His Son, and His Mother, Mary, will undoubtedly congratulate you for having 'set me straight' regarding the 'true meaning' of'righteousness'as found in post # 56!
By the way, you DODGED the point about discriminating against minorities QUITE WELL!
You never really addressed the personal side of the horrors these first responders experienced in their personal lives once Katrina devastated their lives except to generalize them as being both minorities and as having come originally from the criminal element.
That's a real Christian response to human suffering isn't it?????
While you boldly approach the Throne next time, since you believe I am not capable myself of doing so, maybe you can ask what the words 'CHRISTIAN COMPASSION' might happen to mean,
....and whether it applies to minorities who happened to have their lives devastated....
AGAIN, as I said, and I see more clearly,now, your 'game':
Still wrapping yourself in the 'cloak of righteousness' which suits you QUITE WELL as something to hide behind for your insensitivities....
1)Care to respond in any way to your disparaging comments about minorities? (of course not! Hasn't happened yet!)
2)Or your callousness/ total disregard in this post about the personal losses suffered by the first responders? (of course not! Hasn't happened yet!)
Those comments regarding # 1 above, or lack of comments in # 2 above, by you, 'sort of' negate or diminish the message in 1 John 1:9, wouldn't you say????
Just asking.... But then, perhaps I shouldn't ask.
Because you have now a clear pattern of DODGING issues, which when brought to your attention, sear your conscience, and render you incapable of responding to them directly.
Let's start over. One Issue at a time.
Which one do you want to take first?
1. Righteousness
2. My racism
3. Add your own.
I do not care what you think. God cares what you think. I care what God thinks. Oops, more self-righteousness.
One issue at a time. Tell where to start.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.