Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'THUNDER' A BLUNDER
NY Post ^

Posted on 09/02/2005 4:00:25 PM PDT by frogjerk

THE Ed Burns time-travel flick "A Sound of Thunder" takes us back 65 million years, to approximately the last moment when anyone still thought Ed Burns was talented.

It's 2055. Burns plays Dr. Travis Ryer, a scientific genius in Chicago who works for a time-traveling safari company that takes rich, dumb clients on tours to dinosaur days.

After zapping themselves into the Cretaceous period, Ryer and Co. lay down a fussy invisible plank, sort of like grandma's plastic furniture covers, to make sure nobody steps on anything in the ecosystem. Harming a single butterfly or moving a grain of pollen, Ryer warns, can totally alter the course of history, even threaten the existence of the human race.

Shooting dinosaurs is cool, though.

In the prehistoric jungle, the time travelers are startled by an angry roar, and forced to confront what appears to be footage from "Land of the Lost." The T. rex-like allosaurus they meet is a jerking, arthritic visual effect that not only isn't as scary as the "Jurassic Park" monsters, it isn't as scary as the "Jurassic Park" lunch box.

Ryer shoots it with impunity because his sarcastic British-accented computer, T.A.M.I., can pinpoint dinosaurs who are about to die in a few minutes anyway. So pumping a 20-ton Cretaceous animal full of laser ammunition won't alter history a jot. But hands off that pollen!

The safari company's profit-mad CEO Charles Hatton is played by a seriously lost Ben Kingsley with Clorox-white hair. Hatton, a zillionaire who seems to own only one

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: moviereview; sciencefiction; soundofthunder
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
If 65 million years of evolution have been building up to this movie, then Darwin was wrong. But there's no intelligent design here either.

Save your money for gas!

1 posted on 09/02/2005 4:00:25 PM PDT by frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
The concept for this tale was a short story published in Playboy magazine back in the 1980s.

See? I really did read the articles!!

2 posted on 09/02/2005 4:03:28 PM PDT by Prime Choice (E=mc^3. Don't drink and derive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

Sounds like one of those really really bad movies that will become a cult classic, like Plan 9 From Outer Space.


3 posted on 09/02/2005 4:04:03 PM PDT by Arkie2 (Mega super duper moose, whine, cheese, series, zot, viking kitties, barf alert!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice

I read this in school 15 years ago or so, and I doubt it was in Playboy. I have a feeling the original idea is somewhere else.


4 posted on 09/02/2005 4:06:31 PM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
This is actually a point that has always bugged me about Ray Bradbury's classic story (which is much better than this drek.) And that pathway (which I think is described as being clear and plastic-like in the story)-how'd they get that there without messing anything up?
5 posted on 09/02/2005 4:06:33 PM PDT by WestVirginiaRebel (Idiots and the Internet don't mix, no matter how hard Michael Moore tries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice

Ray Bradbury wrote the original back in the early Fifties. It can be found in several of his anthologies.


6 posted on 09/02/2005 4:08:24 PM PDT by WestVirginiaRebel (Idiots and the Internet don't mix, no matter how hard Michael Moore tries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice
See? I really did read the articles!!

Dang it, if you're going to do that sort of thing they're going to expect us all to do it.

I hope you're happy.

7 posted on 09/02/2005 4:10:46 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

Oh, right. This guy.

ZERO talent.

8 posted on 09/02/2005 4:10:53 PM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel
And that pathway (which I think is described as being clear and plastic-like in the story)-how'd they get that there without messing anything up?

Shhh... Poetic license, and all that.

At least in Bradbury's short story, the plot holes were excusable in service to the "punchline", the twist ending, since it was barely more than a "one liner" anyway.

But blown up to movie-length proportions (or if anyone had ever tried to make a novel out of it), it is stretching things rather too obviously.

9 posted on 09/02/2005 4:12:19 PM PDT by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
Once again hollywood gives us re-hash. Apparently original ideas are scarce there.
10 posted on 09/02/2005 4:12:38 PM PDT by pipecorp (Let's have a CRUSADE! , the muslims have already started. 1600 replies and not a single post!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

"Ed Burns: When you can't afford the look-alike with actual talent, Edward Norton."


11 posted on 09/02/2005 4:13:42 PM PDT by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice

"The concept for this tale was a short story published in Playboy magazine back in the 1980s.
See? I really did read the articles!!"

I believe you. However, this was originally a short story by Ray Bradbury, of the same title. Probably written in the early 60's.


12 posted on 09/02/2005 4:14:37 PM PDT by Wiseghy (Hmmm....no Guiliani....THAT MEANS THE MAYOR and GOV. are the THE FAILURES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pipecorp
Once again hollywood gives us re-hash. Apparently original ideas are scarce there.

Actually, I would much prefer a "rehash" of the *good* original ideas that are still out there unfilmed in the classic science fiction novels, as opposed to the "original" drek they're slapping onto scripts these days just because the producer's sister's boyfriend's cousin has delusions of scriptwriting ability, or can be hired cheap enough that the bulk of the budget can be used to pay "stars" gobs more than they're actually worth.

13 posted on 09/02/2005 4:16:57 PM PDT by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon

if it hasn't been made yet, its still original.


14 posted on 09/02/2005 4:20:07 PM PDT by pipecorp (Let's have a CRUSADE! , the muslims have already started. 1600 replies and not a single post!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel
Ray Bradbury wrote the original back in the early Fifties. It can be found in several of his anthologies.

And while it was an interesting story, warning major plot point to be reveled as I remember it basically consists of a hunter killing a butterfly (all the dinosaurs killed would have died from natural causes within a short time of the kill) by stepping off a suspended walkway. The unnatural death of that butterfly so changed the future that when they returned to the present all the sings were in German. The Nazis had won WW2. The guied shoots the hunter and that is the Sound of Thunder.

An interesting, as I remember very, short story; but not really enough for a full length movie.

15 posted on 09/02/2005 4:25:16 PM PDT by Friend of thunder (No sane person wants war, but oppressors want oppression.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King

Yeah. I read it in a Sci-Fi collection.I remember the hunting, etc, and the guy steps on a butterfly and screws up history. But I can't remember the author or the title. I DO remember he wrote a few more stories with the same characters/time travel/ hunting theme.


16 posted on 09/02/2005 4:29:04 PM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

It was originally written by Ray Bradbury and was featured on The Ray Bradbury Theater
17 posted on 09/02/2005 4:30:10 PM PDT by catonsville (Evolution is a marvelous thing; I hope our species will try it sometime......Marc Barasch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice

Then it was a reprint. 'A Sound of Thunder' appeared in the July 1956 issue of Playboy.


18 posted on 09/02/2005 4:47:38 PM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King

See post 18.


19 posted on 09/02/2005 4:48:19 PM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice

" See? I really did read the articles!!"

But how are your eyes now?


20 posted on 09/02/2005 4:49:15 PM PDT by brooklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson