1 posted on
09/02/2005 7:54:47 AM PDT by
Panerai
To: Panerai
With the DMCA present this ruling was assured.
2 posted on
09/02/2005 7:58:21 AM PDT by
avg_freeper
(Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
To: Panerai
In a 3-0 decision, the court upheld a trial judge's ruling from October, concluding the programmers' "circumvention in this case constitutes infringement." This is BS. The DMCA, even as bad as it is, allows reverse engineering for purposes of interoperability. In this specific case, interoperability with other game servers.
Ever since it came out, the DMCA has been used as a cudgel for big business to restrict competition and fair use. Even though it hasn't been legally effective in every case, it can still be used as a deterrent -- not everybody has the money to defend themselves.
To: Panerai
4 posted on
09/02/2005 8:07:05 AM PDT by
Jalapeno
To: rdb3; chance33_98; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Bush2000; PenguinWry; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; ...
5 posted on
09/02/2005 8:39:11 AM PDT by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: Panerai
Great. Now throw the gold farmers off the servers, Blizz.
6 posted on
09/02/2005 8:40:53 AM PDT by
The KG9 Kid
(Semper Fi!)
To: Panerai
DMCA needs to be repealed. The courts are not capable of determining the particular cases where interoperability is justified.
7 posted on
09/02/2005 8:50:41 AM PDT by
B Knotts
To: Panerai
To: Panerai
All Your Servers Are Belong To Us!
To: Panerai
OKay so ummm. . how many of you are WoW addicts!
Signed. . .
Chana, 00ber dr00d of Earthen Ring :)
To: Panerai
This is a terrible precedent. This ruling may effect how you can look at and change traffic on your own network. These guys used a simple thing like TCPDUMP to look at the traffic
on their own network which was generated by a video game that
they purchased. Then, they found a way to change where that traffic went
on their own network and diverted it to a different location
on their own network or on some
other participating network. They essentially designed a proxy to handle the traffic themselves and not to connect back to the vendor's server. This ruling demands that you can't do that and that you must permit software that you purchased to be able to connect back to the vendor's servers whether you want it to or not.
Does anyone else see a dangerous precedent being set here?
22 posted on
09/02/2005 10:20:41 AM PDT by
Spiff
(Don't believe everything you think.)
To: Panerai
Nerf Shamans!
36 posted on
09/19/2005 8:00:51 AM PDT by
Spruce
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson