Hahaha... "Oops - I want to put some heat on President Bush. So I backtracked." Joseph Farah flip-flopped? Oh well, no crime in having second thoughts. But when you call for impeachment, have the guts to follow through, will ya? Making the President see the light's fine. And so's protecting our borders. A purely symbolic act would shame Bush? Look how well impeachment constrained Clinton.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
To: goldstategop
Apparently, many people missed the point of my column calling for the impeachment of President Bush for his dereliction of duty on the border and his non-enforcement of immigration laws.
Ahhh. Nothing like some condescension in the latest Farah article. Sorry, Jo(k)e: it's not that we didn't "get" the gist of your "impeach Bush" article, it's that you realized no one but the moonbat Democrats agree with you--so you had to backtrack to save what remains of your reputation.
I can't believe there are people on FR who agree with this nutjob.
2 posted on
09/01/2005 10:29:58 PM PDT by
Terpfen
(Liberals call the Constitution a living document because they enjoy torturing it.)
To: goldstategop
3 posted on
09/01/2005 10:30:23 PM PDT by
MJY1288
(Whenever a Liberal is Speaking on the Senate Floor, Al-Jazeera Breaks in and Covers it LIVE)
To: goldstategop
I enjoy his website.
But, I've heard his radio show.
Joseph Farah is a shrill idiot.
4 posted on
09/01/2005 10:36:25 PM PDT by
Tobor
To: goldstategop
What he's really saying is "Oops! I screwed up, and alienated 98% of my audience... What the hell am I going to do now! :D
5 posted on
09/01/2005 10:36:57 PM PDT by
Echo Talon
(http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
To: goldstategop
"We are not talking about a successful impeachment." A symbolic impeachment? Using the Constitution other than what it was intended for -- high crimes and misdemeanors and the subsequent removal from office -- is so...
liberal.
6 posted on
09/01/2005 10:37:22 PM PDT by
scott7278
(Before I give you the benefit of my reply, I would like to know what we are talking about.)
To: goldstategop
"Joseph Farah flip-flopped?He did the same thing when Y2K failed to produce the-end-of-the-world-as-we-know-it scenario.
A false prophet if there ever was one.
7 posted on
09/01/2005 10:39:38 PM PDT by
Windsong
(FighterPilot)
To: goldstategop
I don't get Farah.
Is he the king of hyperbole or just a loon?
Whatever. He does himself no favors with his over the top blather,
8 posted on
09/01/2005 10:40:33 PM PDT by
zarf
To: goldstategop
This tactic of putting pressure on someone is inexcusable.
It cheapens a tool that means something big and makes it just another petty, partisan, political tool. Just like those who have redefined "lying" as the same as being mistaken.
Impeachment means something. I am ashamed he would even consider this idea.
To: goldstategop
Better than impeachment would be knowledge that if America is attacked by terrorists who sneak in from Mexico due to lax/no border security, American Patriots would hunt down, arrest, and try for High Treason every member of the Administration and each and every Congressman and Senator. ACLU Headquarters and K-street would be revisted by the ghosts of August, 1814.
Country first, politics much, much later.
11 posted on
09/01/2005 10:46:58 PM PDT by
DTogo
(U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
To: Stellar Dendrite; planekT; Map Kernow; Happy2BMe; Chena; kellynla
15 posted on
09/01/2005 10:50:14 PM PDT by
DTogo
(U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
To: goldstategop
And nobody addressed the point that a bill of impeachment would inflame violence in the Middle East, because our enemies would use it as proof that they're winning.
Where would they get that idea? Why our media will paint it like that.
17 posted on
09/01/2005 10:57:23 PM PDT by
coconutt2000
(NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
To: goldstategop
I thought Joe Farrah wasn't allowed on Free Republic?
18 posted on
09/01/2005 11:02:35 PM PDT by
msnimje
To: goldstategop
Does Farah ever write a paragraph with more than one sentence? Just askin'
19 posted on
09/01/2005 11:28:10 PM PDT by
Fudd Fan
(Bergen County, NJ (northeast corner)
To: goldstategop
Joseph Farah: The Male Cindy Sheehan.
23 posted on
09/01/2005 11:58:37 PM PDT by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-G-d, PRO-LIFE..." -- FR founder Jim Robinson)
To: goldstategop
Pat Buchanan will be next to back off. Pat will realize that he is the mental midget we all thought he was and he will take the Crack Pipe from his mouth and come to grips with his ignorance
24 posted on
09/02/2005 12:01:14 AM PDT by
MJY1288
(Whenever a Liberal is Speaking on the Senate Floor, Al-Jazeera Breaks in and Covers it LIVE)
To: goldstategop
There is a reason why he writes for the world net daily and not the tattler or the enquirer. They think he's too nuts.
27 posted on
09/02/2005 5:16:01 AM PDT by
jmaroneps37
(The quisling ratmedia: always eager to remind us of why we hate them.)
To: goldstategop
Who cares what this Fool thinks? Or the Fool he is piggy-backing upon? Or anyone at WorldNut Daily?
To: goldstategop
But the beauty of a bill of impeachment being introduced by a fellow Republican is that it applies political pressure on Bush to do the right thing. The "beauty of a bill of impeachment" ? Farah is one sick bastard.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson