Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wampus SC

I have addressed Greer's situation with regard to holding his office. No charges have been brought against him. He was the legal and official office holder when this case was brought before the court. Because you disagree with the ruling doesn't make him any less rightful to hold the office. When an indictment is brought down, we can talk.


1,337 posted on 10/03/2005 2:21:46 AM PDT by SALChamps03
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1327 | View Replies ]


To: SALChamps03

"Because you disagree with the ruling doesn't make him any less rightful to hold the office."

For crying out loud: how can a blind judge size up witnesses?


1,345 posted on 10/03/2005 5:27:11 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March ("They'll have to basically rip my fingers from this porch." com/focus/bloggers/1483977/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1337 | View Replies ]

To: SALChamps03
"I have addressed Greer's situation with regard to holding his office. No charges have been brought against him. He was the legal and official office holder when this case was brought before the court. Because you disagree with the ruling doesn't make him any less rightful to hold the office. When an indictment is brought down, we can talk."

That in response to the question - yet again - asking if you've ever read the material about Greer you asked for, and were referred to.

You dare not answer that question. Everyone knows why.
1,364 posted on 10/04/2005 1:24:37 AM PDT by Wampus SC (Serf City here we come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1337 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson