Skip to comments.
DARPA's 'Star Wars'-style Laser Cannon
SPACE.com ^
| Tuesday, August 30, 2005
| Bill Christensen
Posted on 09/01/2005 6:37:55 AM PDT by Momaw Nadon
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
To: hopespringseternal
Because mounting it on an airplane solves the problem of running out of ammunition. While the movies show aircraft blasting away with chainguns for minutes at a time, the truth is that ammunition tends to be heavy and aircraft go through it very quickly. Most aircraft, especially fighters, only have a few seconds of ammo. Thus the phrase, "the whole 9 yards" referring to the length of a full magazine of belt fed ammo on the aircraft.
21
posted on
09/01/2005 8:25:45 AM PDT
by
Myrddin
To: Yasotay
One was retired years ago and resides at the USAF museum at Wright-Patterson...
Airborne Laser Lab
To: Trueblackman
Lord Vader will be most pleased!!!! When you've gotten past the energy shield, proceed directly to the rendezvous point. Understood? Good luck. /Leia, TESB
23
posted on
09/01/2005 8:40:56 AM PDT
by
Christian4Bush
(The modern Democratic Party: Attacking our defenders and defending our attackers.)
To: SlowBoat407
24
posted on
09/01/2005 8:46:52 AM PDT
by
Fierce Allegiance
(This ain't your granddaddy's America)
To: Fierce Allegiance
25
posted on
09/01/2005 8:55:04 AM PDT
by
Kevin OMalley
(No, not Freeper#95235, Freeper #1165: Charter member, What Was My Login Club.)
To: indianaconservative
26
posted on
09/01/2005 8:55:08 AM PDT
by
Yasotay
To: bahblahbah
It's being done.
(Worked on the 3D models of several design, including the original THEL (Tactical HE Lasar) design.
What the writer also doesn't mention is the number of large fuel tanks needed to fire several hundred shots: think four pallet loads of tanks for a "permanent" missile defense "fort". Two more pallet containers for radios, radar search points, and computers.
Early (large) designs weren't really very "mobile" - that's why the USAF likes plane-mounted lasers: all the extra gear can be permanently mounted and aligned inside the C-135 airplane.
27
posted on
09/01/2005 9:00:48 AM PDT
by
Robert A Cook PE
(-I contribute to FR monthly, but ABBCNNBCBS supports Hillary's Secular Sexual Socialism every day.)
To: Kevin OMalley
"Kent, this is God speaking. KENT!"
28
posted on
09/01/2005 9:02:47 AM PDT
by
Fierce Allegiance
(This ain't your granddaddy's America)
To: SlowBoat407
But electromagnetic radiation is only bent (dispersed concentrated or changed direction) when transiting two media of different refractive indices. So if you match the indices of refraction the light stays on its original course.
29
posted on
09/01/2005 9:05:16 AM PDT
by
RATkiller
(I'm not communist, socialist, Democrat nor Republican so don't call me names)
To: bahblahbah
Why don't we use laser's for missile defense on ships and cities? I would think applying the technology to those areas would be a lot easier than trying to mount it on an airplane.
The plan is for area defence on a big 747. The laser carrying AC takes up station near the threat country, say off the coast of North Korea, or Iran. When they launch the altitude of the plane gives them the ability to reach into the other guys territory and destroy the missle in boost phase, with the added benefit that the debris ( which may be radioactive, or have Bio or Chem weapons in it) falls onto the bad guys head.
30
posted on
09/01/2005 9:08:01 AM PDT
by
Kozak
(Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
To: RATkiller
But electromagnetic radiation is only bent (dispersed concentrated or changed direction) when transiting two media of different refractive indices. So if you match the indices of refraction the light stays on its original course.My point exactly. Match the RI, and there's no bending. The liquid is mentioned as having an "angle of refraction", and as far as I know, there's no absolute measurement of a single medium having an angle of refraction. It's only determined when the RI of the adjoining medium is known, and then the angle is measured at the interface.
31
posted on
09/01/2005 9:08:33 AM PDT
by
SlowBoat407
(A living affront to Islam since 1959)
To: RATkiller
Sorry hit button too soon. I am assuming what is really meant is that the indices of refraction are equal not the "angle" of refraction which has no meaning unless there are two media.
32
posted on
09/01/2005 9:09:41 AM PDT
by
RATkiller
(I'm not communist, socialist, Democrat nor Republican so don't call me names)
To: Yasotay
We actually did it in the late 1970's with the Airborne Laser Lab (ALL). I was a pilot of the ALL.
33
posted on
09/01/2005 1:31:52 PM PDT
by
Laserman
To: Laserman
I do not doubt it .... those weird shaped domes on top of the planes on the south end of Boeing Field .... they weren't all AWACS .... I was impressed enough with Stingray.
34
posted on
09/01/2005 2:28:10 PM PDT
by
Yasotay
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson