Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sidney Blumenthal RE: Katrina -- 'It's Bush's Fault'
Der Spiegel ^ | 2005-08-31 | Sidney Blumenthal

Posted on 09/01/2005 5:40:44 AM PDT by soundandvision

"No One Can Say they Didn't See it Coming"

By Sidney Blumenthal

In 2001, FEMA warned that a hurricane striking New Orleans was one of the three most likely disasters in the U.S. But the Bush administration cut New Orleans flood control funding by 44 percent to pay for the Iraq war.

An aerial view of the New Orleans airport underwater. Biblical in its uncontrolled rage and scope, Hurricane Katrina has left millions of Americans to scavenge for food and shelter and hundreds to thousands reportedly dead. With its main levee broken, the evacuated city of New Orleans has become part of the Gulf of Mexico. But the damage wrought by the hurricane may not entirely be the result of an act of nature.

A year ago the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers proposed to study how New Orleans could be protected from a catastrophic hurricane, but the Bush administration ordered that the research not be undertaken. After a flood killed six people in 1995, Congress created the Southeast Louisiana Urban Flood Control Project, in which the Corps of Engineers strengthened and renovated levees and pumping stations. In early 2001, the Federal Emergency Management Agency issued a report stating that a hurricane striking New Orleans was one of the three most likely disasters in the U.S., including a terrorist attack on New York City. But by 2003 the federal funding for the flood control project essentially dried up as it was drained into the Iraq war. In 2004, the Bush administration cut funding requested by the New Orleans district of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for holding back the waters of Lake Pontchartrain by more than 80 percent. Additional cuts at the beginning of this year (for a total reduction in funding of 44.2 percent since 2001) forced the New Orleans district of the Corps to impose a hiring freeze. The Senate had debated adding funds for fixing New Orleans' levees, but it was too late.

The New Orleans Times-Picayune, which before the hurricane published a series on the federal funding problem, and whose presses are now underwater, reported online: "No one can say they didn't see it coming ... Now in the wake of one of the worst storms ever, serious questions are being asked about the lack of preparation."

The Bush administration's policy of turning over wetlands to developers almost certainly also contributed to the heightened level of the storm surge. In 1990, a federal task force began restoring lost wetlands surrounding New Orleans. Every two miles of wetland between the Crescent City and the Gulf reduces a surge by half a foot. Bush had promised "no net loss" of wetlands, a policy launched by his father's administration and bolstered by President Clinton. But he reversed his approach in 2003, unleashing the developers. The Army Corps of Engineers and the Environmental Protection Agency then announced they could no longer protect wetlands unless they were somehow related to interstate commerce.

In response to this potential crisis, four leading environmental groups conducted a joint expert study, concluding in 2004 that without wetlands protection New Orleans could be devastated by an ordinary, much less a Category 4 or 5, hurricane. "There's no way to describe how mindless a policy that is when it comes to wetlands protection," said one of the report's authors. The chairman of the White House's Council on Environmental Quality dismissed the study as "highly questionable," and boasted, "Everybody loves what we're doing."

Sign up for Spiegel Online's daily newsletter and get the best of Der Spiegel's and Spiegel Online's international coverage in your In-Box everyday.

"My administration's climate change policy will be science based," President Bush declared in June 2001. But in 2002, when the Environmental Protection Agency submitted a study on global warming to the United Nations reflecting its expert research, Bush derided it as "a report put out by a bureaucracy," and excised the climate change assessment from the agency's annual report. The next year, when the EPA issued its first comprehensive "Report on the Environment," stating, "Climate change has global consequences for human health and the environment," the White House simply demanded removal of the line and all similar conclusions. At the G-8 meeting in Scotland this year, Bush successfully stymied any common action on global warming. Scientists, meanwhile, have continued to accumulate impressive data on the rising temperature of the oceans, which has produced more severe hurricanes.

In February 2004, 60 of the nation's leading scientists, including 20 Nobel laureates, warned in a statement, "Restoring Scientific Integrity in Policymaking": "Successful application of science has played a large part in the policies that have made the United States of America the world's most powerful nation and its citizens increasingly prosperous and healthy ... Indeed, this principle has long been adhered to by presidents and administrations of both parties in forming and implementing policies. The administration of George W. Bush has, however, disregarded this principle ... The distortion of scientific knowledge for partisan political ends must cease." Bush completely ignored this statement.

In the two weeks preceding the storm in the Gulf, the trumping of science by ideology and expertise by special interests accelerated. The Federal Drug Administration announced that it was postponing sale of the morning-after contraceptive pill, despite overwhelming scientific evidence of its safety and its approval by the FDA's scientific advisory board. The United Nations special envoy for HIV/AIDS in Africa accused the Bush administration of responsibility for a condom shortage in Uganda -- the result of the administration's evangelical Christian agenda of "abstinence." When the chief of the Bureau of Justice Statistics in the Justice Department was ordered by the White House to delete its study that African-Americans and other minorities are subject to racial profiling in police traffic stops and he refused to buckle under, he was forced out of his job. When the Army Corps of Engineers' chief contracting oversight analyst objected to a $7 billion no-bid contract awarded for work in Iraq to Halliburton (the firm at which Vice President Cheney was formerly CEO), she was demoted despite her superior professional ratings. At the National Park Service, a former Cheney aide, a political appointee lacking professional background, drew up a plan to overturn past environmental practices and prohibit any mention of evolution while allowing sale of religious materials through the Park Service.

On the day the levees burst in New Orleans, Bush delivered a speech in Colorado comparing the Iraq war to World War II and himself to Franklin D. Roosevelt: "And he knew that the best way to bring peace and stability to the region was by bringing freedom to Japan." Bush had boarded his very own "Streetcar Named Desire."

Sidney Blumenthal, a former assistant and senior advisor to President Clinton and the author of "The Clinton Wars," is writing a column for Salon and the Guardian of London.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: zeigheil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: soundandvision

As much as I loath this guy, and he's probably playing fast and loose with the facts, he brings up something that needs to be addressed. Most of us are outraged at all the "pork" in our federal budget. The last budget was obscene. If we can afford a couple a hundred million dollars to build a "traffic" bridge for a Republican in Alaska, why do we not fund levies for a Democrat in NOLA?


21 posted on 09/01/2005 5:59:35 AM PDT by manwiththehands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

anyone else notice how hitlary has again disappeared?

I thought she was on vacation in Hawaii, with her "husband" Sir William?


22 posted on 09/01/2005 6:01:01 AM PDT by cweese (Hook 'em Horns!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: soundandvision

If I am going to read this (((puke))) I need more periods and paragraphs.


23 posted on 09/01/2005 6:01:47 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: soundandvision

"In response to this potential crisis, four leading environmental groups conducted a joint expert study, concluding in 2004 that without wetlands protection New Orleans could be devastated by an ordinary, much less a Category 4 or 5, hurricane."

Dear Sidney, Even if "wetlands protection" could be accomplished so soon after "four leading environmental groups" arrived at their conclusion in 2004, your article doesn't mention whether such measures would have helped against a Category 4 or 5 hurricane.


24 posted on 09/01/2005 6:04:47 AM PDT by afortiori
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: soundandvision

I'm just waiting for the enviro-wackos to start with the line that "The hurricane was sent by the Earth Mother Goddess Gaia to punish the evil Bush for not signing the Kyoto Treaty". Just wait, it's on the way.

The sun rises in the morning - It's Bush's fault!
Water flows downhill - It's Bush's fault!


25 posted on 09/01/2005 6:05:06 AM PDT by Fred Hayek (Liberalism is a mental disorder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: soundandvision

Sidney Blumenthal is very close to both Clintons, he's probably trying to curry favor with hitlery in order to get a job on her campaign staff.


26 posted on 09/01/2005 6:05:56 AM PDT by moose2004 (You Can Run But You Can't Hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: soundandvision

This is Hillary's lap dog. He speaks for her when he is not writing for ultra left-wing garbage like The Guardian.


27 posted on 09/01/2005 6:06:12 AM PDT by Brofholdonow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cweese

We won't have to suffer through another photo of her in a swimsuit, will we?


28 posted on 09/01/2005 6:10:49 AM PDT by Brofholdonow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek
"The hurricane was sent by the Earth Mother Goddess Gaia to punish the evil Bush for not signing the Kyoto Treaty". Just wait, it's on the way.

You don't have to wait for that one. Robert Kennedy Jr. wrote it yesterday.

My favorite part of his piece is where the hurricane, like an angry Frankenstein's monster, takes a last minute turn towards Mississippi to try to kill its creator - Haley Barbour.

I kid you not. That's his theory.

29 posted on 09/01/2005 6:14:37 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN

Liberals have 0 concept of "accountability for ones actions". This agenda is pushed mainly by the trial lawyers so they can sue for any reason possible and no one is responsible for their own actions.

Like people who buy a house near an airport and then bitch that its noisy all the time.


30 posted on 09/01/2005 6:15:47 AM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: soundandvision

whole = hole...sorry (it's early)


31 posted on 09/01/2005 6:16:30 AM PDT by soundandvision
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: soundandvision

"A year ago the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers proposed to study how New Orleans could be protected from a catastrophic hurricane, but the Bush administration ordered that the research not be undertaken."

The Bush administration does not fund these studies. That is an out-right falsehood. These studies are funded at the Corps division level with additional resources being allocated by Congress, if needed.

The Corps does feasibility studies all the time. It has nothing to do with the president.


32 posted on 09/01/2005 6:18:26 AM PDT by L98Fiero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: soundandvision
Interesting to see that this moron could only get crap like this published in Der Spiegel. Anyone know what Der Spiegel's distribution figures are for the US?? Sydney should be in NOLA supporting the "less fortunates" that have had to resort to looting and car-jacking as their contribution to disaster relief.
33 posted on 09/01/2005 6:27:59 AM PDT by USMA '71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sister_T
Someone here mentioned that it was actually Clinton who deserves the blame for what happened in New Orleans because the Army Corp of Engineers went to him about N.O. but he was the one who refused to give them the help they needed.

Do you know where I can find that story?

34 posted on 09/01/2005 6:39:58 AM PDT by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: soundandvision

His isn't called "Sid Vicious" for nothing.

Even Hillary's gang of harpy lesbians was afraid of him because of his blackmail threats.

This thug is Damien in cheap black shoes.

35 posted on 09/01/2005 6:41:46 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

You nailed it. Its a Donk town, thru and thru.


36 posted on 09/01/2005 6:53:05 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: soundandvision

Facts in, merda out by the noted Mr. Blumenthal


37 posted on 09/01/2005 6:57:26 AM PDT by hgro (ews)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: soundandvision

The Princess of Darkness speaks.


38 posted on 09/01/2005 6:57:33 AM PDT by Fides et Ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: soundandvision
What an ass. I grew up in NO, and they were talking about this scenario in the 1970's. What is obvious to those of us that grew up there is the difference between the "River Levees" and the "New" canal levee that failed.

The River Levees are huge earthen dams so wide you can drive a truck on top of them. They are covered with concrete to prevent erosion near water level. They held.

The levee that failed looked like a concrete slab that was attached to an earthen support. The flat surface is weaker than a real levee that is sloped. The flat concrete presents a target for wind and waves the destroy. I realize it was a canal, but still... that was not a "real levee". That is not the President's fault.
39 posted on 09/01/2005 7:01:21 AM PDT by handy (Forgive me this day, my daily typos...The Truth is not a Smear!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pbrown

I read it here on FreeRepublic and I can't remember which thread I saw it. Sorry.


40 posted on 09/01/2005 7:04:27 AM PDT by Sister_T (Starve a RINO!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson