[mict42]

I agree with you. The president is a moral man and possesses all of qualities that compelled me to vote for him. The previous man was a charlatan and totally disgraced the office. I still disagree with some of our current president's logistics. If we had secured the borders of Iraq, the insurgents from Iran and Syria wouldn't have made it in to disrupt our honorable attempt to bring democracy to the Iraq. Likewise, if we knew who was entering the USA, we could possibly prohibit a Trojan Horse entry. Everybody gets so defensive.

[SMARTY]

It's a mistake and truly unrealistic to expect 100% satisfaction with the President on 100% of the issues. Going to Iraq is something which the President did almost (in terms of global opinion) independently. It can be remembered that other nations came with us, notably Gr. Br. and Italy and Poland...but in fact the major European powers who were expected to support the US and President Bush were not only refusing but were opposing his action. That we even went and have achieved the success we have is a monumental world event...time will reveal just how monumental this is. In fact, I always marvel at just how brainless most critics are in their treatment of our anti-terror war. If they possessed any understanding of history or military/political history, the absolutely seismic nature of the coalition success against terror would be plain. No objection could be possible to anyone who understands how this world is put together.

[ohioWfan]

Everybody gets so defensive.

It is not 'defensive' for others to point out that what you said was not only completely out of place on this thread, but was factually incorrect.

If you were not so defensive, you would admit your error in posting an emotional attack on the President that was not at all valid.

[Fudd Fan]

Sounds like there's a lot here that we all agree on... can we keep it that way just for now? Thanks.