Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: Calif. May Impose Air Controls on Wineries
ap on Yahoo ^ | 8/30/05 | Juliana Barbassa

Posted on 08/30/2005 7:20:52 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

FRESNO, Calif. - Napa and Sonoma may attract wine connoisseurs and tourists to their bucolic settings to taste well-known wines, but the San Joaquin Valley has long been the industry workhorse, producing most of the nation's wine.

Now environmental regulators say the same process that gives the region's affordable reds, whites and blushes their pleasant punch is also producing a share of the smog that makes the valley one of the nation's dirtiest air basins — and they aim to do something about it.

The San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District is considering imposing the nation's first air quality control on wineries, focusing on the largest vintners — companies such as E&J Gallo, Delicato, and Constellation Wines.

Wineries are the latest target of the district, which has struggled for years to clean up the valley's persistent pollution, by first going after manufacturers, the construction industry, and even home fireplaces.

Recently it has turned to agriculture, which had long been exempt from the controls imposed on municipalities and other businesses. The district has already asked farmers to keep the dust down during harvest, and is even looking at controlling emissions from dairy cows.

Wineries have come under scrutiny because the fermentation process that turns grape sugars to alcohol releases ethanol, methanol and other organic compounds into the atmosphere, where they react with sunlight and heat to form ozone, one of the components of smog, air regulators said.

With the region producing roughly 70 percent of California's table wine, that results in 788 tons of pollutants a year.

Of the 109 wineries in the valley that put out about 338 million gallons of wine each year, 18 are responsible for about 95 percent of the emissions that lead to smog, regulators said.

Pollutants emanating from the three- to four-month fermentation process hit the atmosphere mostly in September and October, when federal smog limits are most often violated, according to the air district.

Since no other country asks vintners to control emissions, the regulations will cut into profits, producers said, and could hurt the position of valley vintners in the international market.

California is the world's largest producer of wine after France, Italy and Spain. Much of the San Joaquin Valley's production ends up in $5 to $10 bottles, attracting customers looking for an affordable product. An increase in the cost of production would translate into a price hike that could hurt their market share, producers said.

"This is going to be another increase in cost that is going to put me at a disadvantage," said Steve Kautz, president of Ironstone Vineyards, which has about 5,000 acres of wine grapes.

His Bear Creek Winery in Lodi produces 600,000 cases a year of Leaping Horse, a popular line that retails at $5 to $6 a bottle.

Equipment proposed to suck up vapors released in the winemaking process would be required on the largest stainless steel fermenting tanks — those holding 50,000 gallons or more. That would mean outfitting 20 tanks at Ironstone's Bear Creek facility, potentially a large investment, said director of operations Craig Rous.

Industry representatives said they want to work with the air district, but complained untested equipment could hurt their product and cost tens of millions of dollars — too much for the amount of pollution it would eliminate.

"When you look at the amount of ethanol that wineries are accountable for, and for the amount of emissions — it's a very small fraction," said Wendell Lee, an attorney for the Wine Institute, which represents about 800 California producers.

Regulators are trying to be flexible, and are looking for other ways in which vintners could cut back emissions, such as by cleaning up their diesel fleet, said Scott Nester, the air district's planning director.

The air district plans hearings on the subject in October and a vote on the rule in December.

Pollution controllers realize what they're asking wineries to do is expensive — but not out of line with what they've asked other industries to do, Nester said.

"Cost is a consideration," Nester said. "But that's not to say wine companies can't afford it."

Wine consumption in the U.S. has been increasing steadily for years, bolstering the industry's growth. Domestic consumption grew 63 percent between 1991 and 2004, when California shipped 428 million gallons of wine to the rest of the country — a $15 billion retail value.

Community activists dedicated to cleaning up the dirty air said the area can't afford to make exceptions. Pollution forces some residents to stay indoors for months, when emergency rooms see a spike in visits from people with respiratory problems.

"If we let one industry off the hook, others will want the same," said Mark Stout, air quality consultant with Fresno Metro Ministry, a nonprofit that works on issues affecting the Fresno area. "If we don't all pitch in, we're not going to make it."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: air; california; controls; impose; wineries
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 08/30/2005 7:20:52 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Wine smog? Only in California.


2 posted on 08/30/2005 7:22:01 PM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Merlot harharhar
3 posted on 08/30/2005 7:23:05 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
And these are the same folks who complain about cow farts.

The inmates run the asylum.

4 posted on 08/30/2005 7:23:11 PM PDT by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

California's liberals won't give up until they "control" every aspect of every person's life.

How long will it be before there is no more business in that state to tax or regulate? Next there will be a law to fine any business that leaves the state.....

At the rate things are going there, might as well give it back to the mexicans. They can then destroy it further......


5 posted on 08/30/2005 7:24:07 PM PDT by ridesthemiles (ridesthemiles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dljordan

How about air-quality controls for the CA legislature?


6 posted on 08/30/2005 7:24:44 PM PDT by thulldud (It's bad luck to be superstitious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

California's liberals won't give up until they "control" every aspect of every person's life.

How long will it be before there is no more business in that state to tax or regulate? Next there will be a law to fine any business that leaves the state.....

At the rate things are going there, might as well give it back to the mexicans. They can then destroy it further......


7 posted on 08/30/2005 7:24:59 PM PDT by ridesthemiles (ridesthemiles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thulldud
How about air-quality controls for the CA legislature?

Haven't you heard? Their sh*t doesn't stink!

8 posted on 08/30/2005 7:26:02 PM PDT by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Where we need air controls is on the RADICAL LIBERAL LEGISLATURE in California -- the amount of methane rising from the "mouths" of these asses, is really polluting this state!!!!


9 posted on 08/30/2005 7:28:12 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stboz

I'm sure this will help them compeat with low cost Australian and Chilean wine.
There are many thousands of tons of natural sources of the same gas. This process goes on in nature as well.
Leave the grapes on the vine and you would have it coming from bird farts.


10 posted on 08/30/2005 7:29:29 PM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: stboz

I know -- The very sun sets the same time that they do.


11 posted on 08/30/2005 7:30:29 PM PDT by thulldud (It's bad luck to be superstitious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: stboz

I sort of agree. Once in a while I zing CA and get flamed. My kids live there, as well as my best friend. When they want to see us, I tell them to fly to NC. When asked why? My response is you can't fart or have a smoke without breaking some dopey law. And yet the queers are ... whatever they do.


12 posted on 08/30/2005 7:37:27 PM PDT by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat
Self destructive behavior is sad to see. I love good Califorina wine and it seems a shame to damage the industry.
13 posted on 08/30/2005 7:37:37 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Thank goodness. I just had to get my Prius check today, lucky I passed.


14 posted on 08/30/2005 7:42:54 PM PDT by 359Henrie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Self destructive behavior is sad to see.
------
Yes it is for we Californians. But our state has been hijacked by radical liberals that care only about big government and oppressive control over business and individuals.

They are nuts, like all liberals. They have driven more businesses out of the state than can be counted and the bleeding continues....liberal fools, and everything they touch turns to excrement.


15 posted on 08/30/2005 7:42:58 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

I really think Californians should take a good hard look at their zoning laws from the point of view of planning so that people drive less.


16 posted on 08/30/2005 7:46:10 PM PDT by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; All

WTF????


17 posted on 08/30/2005 7:46:46 PM PDT by KevinDavis (the space/future belongs to the eagles --> http://www.cafepress.com/kevinspace1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClaireSolt

I really think Californians should take a good hard look at their zoning laws from the point of view of planning so that people drive less.
-------
Too late for that really. If the US had any sense early on, it would have put emphasis on a large mass transit system like many countries have. Then the state could have oriented its areas around the transit lanes...oh well.


18 posted on 08/30/2005 7:49:40 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
Too late for that really. If the US had any sense early on, it would have put emphasis on a large mass transit system like many countries have. Then the state could have oriented its areas around the transit lanes...oh well.

The US did orient its areas around transit lanes, they are called roads. What has any of this crap about mass transit and rezoning have to do with the idiotic legislature in CA planing one more law on top of numberous other laws that are not working for air polution? Wine is the subject here not cars.

And for the record anyone that thinks CA could get away with mass transit has simply not lived here, especially in Northern CA.

19 posted on 08/30/2005 7:58:34 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: calex59

Numberous=numerous


20 posted on 08/30/2005 7:59:28 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson