Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mayor: Major Breach Flooding and Destroying New Orleans
BayouBuzz.com ^ | 8/30/2005 | Steve Sabludowsky

Posted on 08/30/2005 1:47:40 AM PDT by Prince Charles

Mayor: Major Breach Flooding and Destroying New Orleans
National
Author: Steve Sabludowsky | 8/30/2005 Home : Business

The City of New Orleans Is Devastated. Those were the words of Mayor C. Ray Nagin and based upon a major breach of a levee system, water is flowing into New Orleans flooding it beyond recognition and could very well destroy New Orleans, Jefferson and the surrounding areas.

In a most frightening interview with WWL TV, Mayor C. Ray Nagin gave the worse-case scenario of events that anyone could possibly imagine. In the beginning of the interview, he stated that New Orleans is devastated.

Of most importance is the breach of the levee between Jefferson and Orleans Parish.

“We probably have 80 percent of our city under water with some sections of our city the water is as deep as 20 feet”.

Both airports are underwater.

The twin spans are destroyed.

The Yacht club is burned and destroyed.

Mayor Nagin also stated he was not sure of the structural soundness of the highrise. He stated that it is possible that the highrise bridge in east New Orleans could be unstable.

(Excerpt) Read more at bayoubuzz.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: breach; flood; incompetence; katrina; katrinafailures; levee; neworleans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-209 next last
To: Prince Charles

I wonder about the history of how it came to be built there. Was it originally dry and that has sunk over the years? I mean, that's possible, because it's basically alluvial mud, not the most solid place to build.

Or did they gradually build levees, and expand the area, and reclaim it? Probably for agriculture at first, I imagine just about anything would grow like weeds in the soil.

Anybody know more about it?


21 posted on 08/30/2005 2:14:24 AM PDT by djf (Government wants the same things I do - MY guns, MY property, MY freedoms!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: stlnative

Can't barges run aground too?


22 posted on 08/30/2005 2:15:56 AM PDT by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: djf

Good questions. I do know that the ground has been sinking for a long time there.


23 posted on 08/30/2005 2:18:13 AM PDT by Prince Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Cedar

yes - but they have a foam core and they have to be weighed down - how would you do it in a breech that is flowing with water and could it be done quickly enough without killing the workers that are doing it?


24 posted on 08/30/2005 2:19:28 AM PDT by stlnative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles

NO is toast. God bless and keep those that have lost everything.


25 posted on 08/30/2005 2:20:17 AM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stlnative

Actually, it wasn't my suggestion :)


26 posted on 08/30/2005 2:20:24 AM PDT by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Cedar

:-)


27 posted on 08/30/2005 2:22:50 AM PDT by stlnative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: djf

NO was originally dry, protected by an extensive marsh system.

Over the years, through man's foolish manipulation of the lower Mississippi River, the marshes are gone, and NO is sinking ever deeper.

If NO is as badly devastated as it now appears to be, there is no good way to fix it.


28 posted on 08/30/2005 2:24:30 AM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: clee1

I wonder if it will sink more if the bowl fills up with water


29 posted on 08/30/2005 2:28:00 AM PDT by stlnative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: clee1

Well, I imagine, marshes or not, if you put something heavy there, it will sink.

Probably a couple thousand feet down to bedrock, if not more.

I wonder if anyone has ever studied the natural turnover process of the soils on and around massive river deltas. They are quite a unique environment.

I still stand my my earlier statement, we ain't carp.

Maybe I should amend it, we ain't shrimp.

Well, I ain't!!

;-)


30 posted on 08/30/2005 2:30:12 AM PDT by djf (Government wants the same things I do - MY guns, MY property, MY freedoms!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: djf

You are absolutely correct. New Orleans sits on sediment. There is plenty of room to compress. Any extra weight will not help. Fortunately it takes a long time to cause a measurable depression, and the water should be long gone by then (hopefully).


31 posted on 08/30/2005 2:34:40 AM PDT by burzum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: djf

Both. The area of the city that was built on high ground has subsided. In addition lots of land had been "reclaimed".


32 posted on 08/30/2005 2:39:55 AM PDT by Straight Vermonter (John 6: 51-58)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles

Or any other report I've heard. This morning's newspapers are saying New Orleans "dodged a bullet"


33 posted on 08/30/2005 2:42:20 AM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Also Bush's fault because he won't sign Kyoto, which would save the world.


34 posted on 08/30/2005 2:43:57 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

Shep said NO doged a major bullet and basically seemed to say that NO was fine.


35 posted on 08/30/2005 2:44:03 AM PDT by jmc1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: clee1

If it isn't a judgement of God on that city, It should be. The story sounds like it's right out of the Old testament.


36 posted on 08/30/2005 2:45:27 AM PDT by Havoc (Reagan was right and so was McKinley. Down with free trade. Hang the traitors high)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Havoc

It really is Biblical in proportion.


37 posted on 08/30/2005 2:47:31 AM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: dandelion; All; WVNan; tiredoflaundry; spectre; 70times7; Kitty Mittens; SJackson; Alouette; ...

"I can't sleep; I can't believe that this is only being covered right now on CNN; I can't fathom how this could possibly be anything beyond catastrophic.

And so I pray. It's all that's left to us, and to the citizens of the Crescent City. God save them."



"“Please I am knocking on your sweet door of your heart; fore in fore again pray for what is happening is heart breaking; at fore older people those whom cannot walk My Majesty My Majesty please help all people of United States of America. You have my commitment I stand by your nation and pray pray for all people in your great nation; in fore people need so much now of it they have lost so much; everything can be replace humans cannot; His Majesty will help them they are more important; be at peace have faith everything is going to be well.”


thank you all be strong good persons be strong!!!!!!!


38 posted on 08/30/2005 2:48:23 AM PDT by anonymoussierra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

Its a good thing the news reporters didn't report 911 like they did yesterday with NO.

Yes, two planes hit the Twin Towers, but nothing else major is going on and the towers are still standing so it looks like NY City doged a massive bullet.


39 posted on 08/30/2005 2:50:58 AM PDT by jmc1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
They'll likely end up not using buildings since they're not dense enough, but I'm sure they'll have no shortage of fill material as time goes on. This is probably a problem that won't be deeply worried about until they've solved other problems unless there is a serious issue about the lack of back pressure on the northern dam.

We're talking about 1,360 acre feet of water or roughly a 2.25 square mile area with one foot of water - a finite amount of water that was in the canal, if my calculations are somewhat reliable. Not a good thing, but not the end of the world either.
40 posted on 08/30/2005 2:54:16 AM PDT by kingu (Draft Fmr Senator Fred Thompson for '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-209 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson