Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Banks on Technology in Revised Military Plan for a Possible North Korea Conflict
NYT ^ | 08/29/05 | THOM SHANKER

Posted on 08/29/2005 5:59:39 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

U.S. Banks on Technology in Revised Military Plan for a Possible North Korea Conflict

By THOM SHANKER

Published: August 29, 2005

CAMP CASEY, South Korea - American commanders are making significant changes in their plans in the event of a military conflict with North Korea, to rely in large measure on a new generation of sensors, smart bombs and high-speed transport ships to deter and, if necessary, counter that unpredictable dictatorship, the senior United States commander in South Korea says.

The shift in strategy is being undertaken even as the United States cuts the number of troops here by one-third and begins moving the remaining soldiers farther from the demilitarized zone, to improve their chances of surviving any North Korean offensive.

Army headquarters in Washington has made a formal announcement that a brigade of Second Infantry Division soldiers sent urgently from South Korea to Iraq last year will not return to South Korea, but will instead return to a base in the United States. That puts the American troop commitment to South Korea on track to drop from 37,500 - a figure maintained since the early 1990's - to 25,000 by 2008.

In a recent interview that provided a detailed public description of the highly classified war-planning process, Gen. Leon J. LaPorte, the commander, described how American contingency plans are being reshaped by new theories of war-fighting and by new military technology.

"We have better intelligence," he said, so the American and South Korean militaries will have more advance warning if North Korea mobilizes for war, providing the opportunity to locate and attack its vast arsenal of artillery and rockets.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: conflict; intelligence; korea; military; mobility; nkorea; sensor; skorea; technology; us; warplan

1 posted on 08/29/2005 5:59:40 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; Jet Jaguar; MizSterious; nuconvert; Iris7; Little Pig; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 08/29/2005 6:01:09 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Would somebody please explain what we're protecting ?


3 posted on 08/29/2005 6:04:23 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

A democratic nation from THE most oppressive government on earth.

Any more questions?


4 posted on 08/29/2005 6:06:48 PM PDT by ruiner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ruiner
Excuse me. We've been there 50 years.
When do THEY get it ?
5 posted on 08/29/2005 6:07:58 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

"Would somebody please explain what we're protecting?"

Japan.


6 posted on 08/29/2005 6:08:43 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Liberal Talking Point - Bush = Hitler ... Republican Talking Point - Let the Liberals Talk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

so how far from the DMZ are they going? if the North Koreans capture Seoul won't our leftist friends demand an end to hostilities. Though i do understand the fear of the artillery barrage.


7 posted on 08/29/2005 6:09:21 PM PDT by Savage219
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

No.


8 posted on 08/29/2005 6:09:58 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Massive Retaliation would be a better strategy, if the North invades it ceases to exist. We should not tie our forces down in garrisons and allow the enemy to decide where we deploy our forces. The 51st Fighter Wing at Osan should be withdrawn to Guam, it would then be in a position to be of use in a conflict with China. In Korea it could be neutralized.
9 posted on 08/29/2005 6:23:58 PM PDT by fallujah-nuker (Atque ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appelant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Japan.

Not to mention 30,000 Americans living or working in South Korea.

10 posted on 08/29/2005 6:26:12 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (I Support the President on Iraq and Our Troops; But 'll Freep Him In A Second for Illegal Alien Mess)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

25,000 still too many and too expensive. Leave a couple of brigades and pull the rest. S. Korea can pick up the slack.


11 posted on 08/29/2005 6:26:45 PM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Yes. If the North and South were ever reunited under Northern rule, Japan would be next.


12 posted on 08/29/2005 6:34:20 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Liberal Talking Point - Bush = Hitler ... Republican Talking Point - Let the Liberals Talk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Savage219
Re #7

More than 50 miles. They would be redeployed south of Suwon, around Pyongtaek.

13 posted on 08/29/2005 7:32:04 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Would somebody please explain what we're protecting ?

Sure, a bunch of ungrateful South Koreans.

14 posted on 08/29/2005 7:44:14 PM PDT by itsahoot (Any country that does not control its borders, is not a country. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

Bingo.


15 posted on 08/30/2005 6:18:35 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson