So, since it's not in the Constitution, sink or swim? The government has the infastructure and know-how to help in disasters like this...but because you don't find that specific charged duty in the Constitution, they should all just sit on their hands? Major disasters are going to cause disruption at the local or state level, so what else should be done, then? They need help, at least initially, to get going again.
Nagin said that the 200 stranded people included 20 police officers who were riding out the storm at their homes in preparation to take over shifts from other officers.
I guess those cops were just stupid fools who should have just gotten out while the gettin' was good, since it's not their job to help out?
Perhaps you are familiar with the Supreme Court decision which states the police have NO duty whatsoever to PREVENT crimes from happening.
Therefore, your argument falls apart. Those police officers have no obligation to risk their own lives for people who MAY need help in this case, especially when the help available will be very limited.
At least you admit federal charity is not Constitutional. But, I never said sink or swim. I am strongly in favor of private charity, and I encourage all Americans to help out as each is able.
Government provided "relief" for natural disasters is no different than welfare or food stamps in my opinion. Both are simply marxism come to life.
"..., to each according to his need". In this case, you allow your emotions to carry you away and obuscate this point, but it is there nonetheless. Just because the people of New Orleans REALLY need help, they should get it.
Guess what, I REALLY need help purchasing a house of my own and a new car. Do you want the federal government to step in and give me some of your money for my "needs"?