Skip to comments.
Rasmussen Poll: Election 2008: Hillary 44% Condi 38%
Rasmussen ^
| 8/29/05
Posted on 08/29/2005 12:09:52 PM PDT by areafiftyone
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
To: areafiftyone
How's Hilly doing against Wonder Woman?
21
posted on
08/29/2005 12:23:14 PM PDT
by
atomicpossum
(Replies should be as pedantic as possible. I love that so much.)
To: areafiftyone
I have had a strong feeling all along that Hillary will NOT be the Dem nominee. It's a long ways off, so much can happen and I sure recall how Gary Hart was considered "inevitable" and look what happened to him. He crashed and burned, leaving the Democrats with no one to take on a rather weak G.H.W. Bush.
The media creates their political stars but some times fellow Democrats take them down, as I believe Dukakis did with Hart (with a LOT of help from the former Colorado Senator of course, what a phony he is and was, as HRH certainly is & always will be).
22
posted on
08/29/2005 12:27:14 PM PDT
by
BonnieJ
To: AntiGuv
With a matchup like that, count me in the 18%..... The notion of "President Hilary Clinton" doesn't scare you more than "President Condoleeza Rice"?
To: Huck
The best way to ensure that you will be saying "President Clinton" again for another 8 years, so get used to it now.
24
posted on
08/29/2005 12:28:03 PM PDT
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: atomicpossum
You mean Edwards? Edwards is Not even on the radar screen. The biggie for the Dems is Clark again.
25
posted on
08/29/2005 12:28:20 PM PDT
by
areafiftyone
(Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
To: TheBigB
Whole lotta attention paid on someone who won't even be the Democratic nominee in '08.Im curious, what do you base that statement on? Right now, Im willing to bet she will be the nominee well before Iowa makes it official..
26
posted on
08/29/2005 12:28:40 PM PDT
by
cardinal4
(Cindy, your 15 minutes are just about up...)
To: Fido969
And Condi's not evenn running! Hillary's been running for 6 years!Excellent point!
27
posted on
08/29/2005 12:30:02 PM PDT
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it.)
To: areafiftyone
Considering neither the First Lady, nor Rice has declared their candidacy for Office, this doesn't look all that good for Hitlerbeast.
28
posted on
08/29/2005 12:31:39 PM PDT
by
ZULU
(Fear the government which fears your guns. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
To: AntiGuv
I like this poll. Hillary's negatives are huge, and I suspect she's at her ceiling. Hillary's been in the news for well on fourteen years now. People have only really known Rice as Secretary of State for six months.
Prior to that she existed in the shadows as Bush's NSC advisor. And she hasn't been campaigning for anything.
I'd say Condi has room to grow, here. Condi's negatives are really low, and I suspect this poll is much better news for her than it is for the Hilly. The minute Rice gets into the race and starts swinging, she has nowhere to go but up.
Be Seeing You,
Chris
29
posted on
08/29/2005 12:32:37 PM PDT
by
section9
(Major Motoko Kusanagi says, "Jesus is Coming. Everybody look busy...")
To: Bluegrass Conservative
Maybe once 2008 rolls around it will. But for now, the notion of either is pretty awful in my view. I take comfort that I live in a 'safe' GOP state and therefore my vote doesn't really matter, so I can cast non-guilt votes. There's no way Hillary is gonna carry NC.
30
posted on
08/29/2005 12:32:57 PM PDT
by
AntiGuv
("Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." Philip K. Dick)
To: bill1952
The best way to ensure that you will be saying "President Clinton" again for another 8 years, so get used to it now. If that's what the GOP wants, that's what they'll get.
31
posted on
08/29/2005 12:33:36 PM PDT
by
Huck
(" 'Neo-Con' is like an old headline. Nobody will know what it means in 10 years."--Keith Richards)
To: Bluegrass Conservative
While not a certainty, she would garner a LOT of the black votes and that will force the dems to spend big bucks to stop the loss in traditionally strong & locked up areas that are crucial to winning states like Pa.
IMO, that would be a nightmare scenario for the Dems to have to lay out all that money in Phila, chicago, Detroit, and such areas.
32
posted on
08/29/2005 12:34:44 PM PDT
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: areafiftyone
This poll would carry some merit with me, were I convinced that either party had used up their supply of wealthy white guys to run for the Presidency. ;)
33
posted on
08/29/2005 12:38:42 PM PDT
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
To: areafiftyone
I thought Hillary would poll higher with the question, "who looks more natural in Ol' Crusty?"
34
posted on
08/29/2005 12:39:32 PM PDT
by
auboy
To: cardinal4; bill1952
Hillary is the female Howard Dean, nothing more. She may excite the far-left fruitcakes, just like Deanie did last year. But by the time things start to actually shake out, the majority will see that she can't possibly win, and they'll turn to someone bland but "safe."
(Oct, 2003) Former Vermont Governor Dr. Howard Dean, who enjoyed a 40% - 17% lead in October polling of New Hampshire Democratic primary likely voters over Massachusetts Senator John Kerry, has stretched that lead in December polling to 42% - 12%.
The same thing will happen to Hill o'beans. mark my words.
35
posted on
08/29/2005 12:39:35 PM PDT
by
TheBigB
(It's funktastic!!)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
36
posted on
08/29/2005 12:39:44 PM PDT
by
areafiftyone
(Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
To: Huck
Childish and illogical.
It's not what the GOP wants that we are talking about here.
It's about what is best for America, and that's what we want.
But keep your petulant attitude.
37
posted on
08/29/2005 12:40:02 PM PDT
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: TheBigB
She may excite the far-left fruitcakes Actually the Far Left Fruitcakes don't like her because she voted for the war and she panders to the middle. They prefer Clark or someone else. BUT they WILL vote for her if she gets the nomination just to put a Dem in the White House.
38
posted on
08/29/2005 12:41:23 PM PDT
by
areafiftyone
(Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
To: TheBigB
Bill will not let that happen, and he has a proven track record of beating the snot out of Republicans.
We are up against the Clintons.
39
posted on
08/29/2005 12:41:55 PM PDT
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: areafiftyone
Some don't, most do. She won't be the nominee.
40
posted on
08/29/2005 12:42:36 PM PDT
by
TheBigB
(It's funktastic!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson