Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: oceanview

My larger point in this, is that I am not sure the models note the compartmentalizatio of the levee system and how cost/benefit improvements could be made.

I also think people should be let home, with the usual be safe warnings (dont touch power lines)


3,997 posted on 08/29/2005 1:18:19 PM PDT by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3955 | View Replies ]


To: fooman
I also think people should be let home, with the usual be safe warnings (dont touch power lines)

There's a cost to that, though. When they're not in the affected areas they're not crowding the infrastructure and requiring additional logistical support (e.g., food, water, emergency services). I'm not sure that normal property-rights considerations necessarily apply at the beginning of a serious crisis management effort.

4,020 posted on 08/29/2005 1:23:30 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3997 | View Replies ]

To: fooman

Well, a while back a LA poster noted that they may not have confidence yet that the levees are going to continue to hold, that there may be concern about liquification and weak spots. Remember, even without storm surge, most of the city is still below sea level, so a breach could still cause devastating flooding. I sure wouldn't let people back in until all the levees of a bowl where checked out.


4,050 posted on 08/29/2005 1:30:07 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3997 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson