To: Zechariah_8_13
Roof, structurally, is not the same as roof cover. My understanding is that a small portion of the cover has come off, but have not heard that the roof supporting structure has been damaged.
Disclaimer: I am not an engineer.
1,224 posted on
08/29/2005 6:47:11 AM PDT by
Gondring
(I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
To: Gondring
Roof, structurally, is not the same as roof cover. My understanding is that a small portion of the cover has come off, but have not heard that the roof supporting structure has been damaged.
I understand that. I never claimed that I thought the roof integrity was compromised by the loss of cover. I only argued that in this case, the roof IS an integral part of the building stability. I didn't mean the foam, I meant the actual roof structure.
1,239 posted on
08/29/2005 6:49:36 AM PDT by
Zechariah_8_13
(Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson