[b_sharp]

"YEC INTREP - what an ignorant article. The author displays a total lack of understanding of what ID advocates, an ignorance of the design of the eye, and a total unawareness of irreducible complexity and information theory. It is easy to burn down a strawman - a lot more diificult to deal with reality."

I suspect Dennet has a great deal more understanding of ID, the design of the eye, IC and information theory than you would like to give him credit for. I suggest you read his "Darwin's Dangerous Idea".

[Oztrich Boy]

Darwin's Dangerous Idea

He said Darwin's idea was dangerous? Why are we still teaching it in the schools? Will noöne think of the children?

[LiteKeeper]

Simple question: have you read any Dembski or Behe? The author is a professor of Philosophy - not science